From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23479 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2012 18:25:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 22991 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2012 18:25:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:24:54 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 513BF2C0069; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:24:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:25:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: STC for libapr1 failure Message-ID: <20120214182452.GK25918@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4F3A14A8.4090506@acm.org> <20120214140240.GB25918@calimero.vinschen.de> <20120214144551.GC25918@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F3AA0BB.7000806@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F3AA0BB.7000806@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00423.txt.bz2 On Feb 14 09:58, David Rothenberger wrote: > On 2/14/2012 6:45 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Feb 14 15:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> On Feb 14 00:00, David Rothenberger wrote: > >>> The libapr1 test cases are failing again for flock locks. This same > >>> test case failed with 1.7.9 with a fatal error[1], but that was > >>> corrected. The test is no longer encountering the fatal error, but > >>> it is producing the wrong result. > >> > >> Thanks for the testcase. I think I found the issue. An event handle > >> was closed in the wrong place, outside of the important mutex lock for > >> the lock object. I applied the patch to CVS. Your testcase now appears > >> to run fine for me. Can you try your entire testsuite again and see > >> if there's another failure lurking? > > > > I uploaded a snapshot for testing. > > Thanks. The snapshot fixes the flock test case, but now the fcntl test > case is failing. *Sob*. How so? Does it hang or does it allow multiple concurrent exclusive locks as the flock case? > I'll try to send an STC for that case, but I suspect the one from last > year will have the problem. Please send it anyway. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple