From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25780 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2012 13:32:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 25771 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Mar 2012 13:32:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (HELO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org) (204.13.248.71) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:31:50 +0000 Received: from pool-173-76-45-163.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([173.76.45.163] helo=cgf.cx) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAi7J-000LJZ-Nj for cygwin@cygwin.com; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:31:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9907E13C002 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:31:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+trsBfZD8458VayK7CLHjD Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:32:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for i686-pc-cygwin Message-ID: <20120322133149.GB10643@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4F575A90.8060201@cs.utoronto.ca> <20120307130723.GB14210@calimero.vinschen.de> <4F5763D9.8030602@cs.utoronto.ca> <4F5764E3.8090004@gmail.com> <20120322072533.GA2948@qp9482> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120322072533.GA2948@qp9482> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00595.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:25:09AM +0100, Denis Excoffier wrote: >On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 01:38:43PM +0000, Dave Korn wrote: >>> On 07/03/2012 13:34, Ryan Johnson wrote: >>> > On 07/03/2012 8:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> >> On Mar 7 07:54, Ryan Johnson wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> >>> I tried to bootstrap the gcc-4.7 RC and it fails because it expects >>> >>> to find and the file actually lives in >>> >>> (see >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513). >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm asking here because the gcc devs thought this would mean 4.6 is >>> >>> broken as well, but I have 4.6.2 running. Did process.h perhaps move >>> >>> between 1.7.10 and 1.7.11? I guess configure must be using linker >>> >>> rather than preprocessor tests for presence of spawnve, because it >>> >>> thinks (correctly) that the function exists. >>> >> See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2012-02/msg00041.html >>> >> We moved it back. If you have it in cygwin/process.h, you didn't >>> >> update from 1.7.10 to 1.7.11. >>> > Ah, I do remember that, now that you mention, but I was running a 1.7.11 >>> > snapshot and forgot to upgrade... >>> > >>> > Thanks for the quick reply, >>> > Ryan >>> >>> Thanks for spotting that Ryan. FTR, I figure it's not worth delaying the >>> GCC release to add a fix to support .10, since there were other significant >>> problems with it, and anyone who has it should be moving to .11 anyway. >>> > >Perhaps we could nevertheless find a means to move >into , while not breaking GCC compilation during >the mean time? A patch to GCC-4.8 to search first for >and if not found? And, for Cygwin, >cp -p cygwin/process.h process.h? SHTDI. Why are we still talking about this? We moved the header file back where it has been for a decade or more. The case is now closed. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple