From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17094 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2012 08:27:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 16145 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2012 08:26:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:26:11 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 16A3B2C0074; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:26:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:27:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cannot Execute urxvt after upgrade Message-ID: <20120720082609.GW31055@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <5008629D.5090308@redhat.com> <50086E81.9000406@cygwin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50086E81.9000406@cygwin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00433.txt.bz2 On Jul 19 16:30, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > On 7/19/2012 4:15 PM, Aaron Schneider wrote: > >On 19/07/2012 22:00, K Stahl wrote: > >>>urxvt depends on cygperl5_10.dll, which was removed in the upgrade to > >>>perl 5.14. Either urxvt needs to be rebuilt, or the old perl 5.10 > >>>libraries need to be restored for a bit longer. > >> > >>Knowing that there are numerous dependencies on the perl upgrade, > >>could we get someone to update the urxvt package? > >> > > > >I couldn't find any version of urxvt on cygwin's release mirror, so, no > >packages to start from. > > > > >Furthermore, for what you are looking for, isn't > >rxvt pretty much the same? > > > >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00078.html > > Pretty much, minus the unicode support and some other niceties mentioned > in the message you quoted above. Of course, stepping back to rxvt puts you > in the realm of dead code. So if bit-rot is OK with you... ;-) One word: mintty. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple