From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18458 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2012 17:48:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 18438 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2012 17:48:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org (HELO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org) (204.13.248.72) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:48:21 +0000 Received: from pool-173-76-45-230.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([173.76.45.230] helo=cgf.cx) by mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SsHJM-0004Cz-E3 for cygwin@cygwin.com; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:48:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685BD429680 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:48:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX191EGrkWUR7tz6PqD+DzvNg Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:48:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: rebaseall invocation error Message-ID: <20120720174819.GA2064@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20120720170423.GA850@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00446.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:36:07PM -0400, Mirko Vukovic wrote: >Problem fixed ... see below > >On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Christopher Faylor > wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:00:45PM -0400, Mirko Vukovic wrote: >>>Hello, >>> >>>I am running rebaseall manually to enable X11: I found a post >>>suggesting to rebase to 0x77000000 >>> >>>I am following instructions on http://cygwin.wikia.com/wiki/Rebaseall >> >> You realize that the project web site is: http://cygwin.com/ right? You >> can't expect instructions from unrelated sites to work. You shouldn't >> need to use the above anymore with new improvements to reabase. > >True. But I did not find anything else better and the instructions on >that site jibed with what I read on the cygwin mailing list over the >years. That's why I went with it. But this wasn't actually "better". Just running rebaseall, as suggested by the official Cygwin FAQ is the correct advice. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple