From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26662 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2014 09:24:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 26630 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jan 2014 09:24:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:24:02 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id D1E391A06F7; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:23:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:24:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Bringing up NFS server on 64 bits Message-ID: <20140113092359.GA19104@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <001701cf0e08$e399abe0$aacd03a0$%fedin@samsung.com> <20140110135208.GG10296@calimero.vinschen.de> <002301cf0e10$6c1ed7e0$445c87a0$%fedin@samsung.com> <20140110150726.GH10296@calimero.vinschen.de> <002701cf1023$0e4b0110$2ae10330$%fedin@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+QahgC5+KEYLbs62" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002701cf1023$0e4b0110$2ae10330$%fedin@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1111 On Jan 13 09:48, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! >=20 > > Not necessarily. If the package is in a good shape, has no known > > security issues, and works fine with the latest Cygwin, you're good. > > Other than that, just keep an eye on the Cygwin ML if somebody reported > > a problem with your packages and see if you can lend a hand, maybe. >=20 > This doesn't sound too bad. >=20 > > This is a generic problem. Maintaining packages does not actually cost > > a lot of time, unless you're trying to stick to the bleeding edge or > > try to maintain too many packages. But people still shy away from that > > without even trying. That's pretty disappointing. >=20 > Ok, i will try to. Thanks! > So far: > Packages to update: rpcgen, nfs-server > New package: rpcbind >=20 > Is rpcgen maintained or not ? Marco answered that. > And, nobody has answered the question. Who are original authors of this = NFS server ? SUN Microsystems, AFAIK. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS07CvAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+geOYP/15bZmX4mSQiNeio2Yau1n+K OTiwowfe3yV/+vK8LtT5xVcatVTlRF9R7zjY8zhOmu/EPXVhDgt8bm/RbA6rbnmd snDPdrhnv7GclvO6kWgFwdwJrqFTXMxiim/dJNwgfJVatds5k1s3aaJtMTKFRnqE pNG/0yf4ey7RiGWi+JklWmKlnjiI/0OJtk4Uir7UrJIS8eVDo4GcOpg5uU/Q/Xgw Jmm7RXeyoBH9fdVoqM5/y8hK77+/QXHy+xIztwJHfaJyDc0qHTZzveSzu1cfAK8C DxGojzOIBnYYxbrYf4E460fmwGIeV8cWHPa7Ipp3w4RH+JUF9GO1W88n0TVL/GIn EMRX0ms1HOx9rIamwpA/M41KrNUTX4T1cYGOPruFdsWYqyAdLKd61yAG+lazavnK HiQeTs7USiHSP2IGeQBgjZ3dnM+X668UXEhVetfIO8Wi++ZqHHReF2CZR10qF3On FOWEcnS6xmJGyY4Y6GtSrVvWamZN7A1dq9MyOBurKVOTKTeOk3vOugQxPVxqsleC 7KBvd/WHPYPYc2hWVjyoOEjRxp4SsiHFEDRw0dH/76UDm99omZ6o6tf3K3t2Cs0m gDkn1O7wnNYukDQz4v/k2k6SuR97Q8x4PZs8gukF6Q9Hqy9+YIN7WNOHNfeuI/C0 ob5Idy6Dukv9RmHKIaFE =/9hg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62--