On Jan 17 16:32, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:29:45PM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
> >On 1/17/2014 13:45, Aaron Humphrey wrote:
> >>
> >> So why does it think it
> >> requires ip6.h if it compiles fine without it?
> >
> >It's probably an unwarranted Linuxism.
> 
> AUL.  I like it.

Our ipv6 stuff is in cygwin/in6.h, which is included by cygwin/in.h,
which in turn is included by netinet/in.h.

We could fetch FreeBSDs netinet/ip6.h.  In contrast to Glibc's 
netinet/ip6.h it does not include netinet/in.h but we could add
that.

Aaron, if you copy this file:

http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/10/sys/netinet/ip6.h?revision=256281&view=co

into /usr/include/netinet, and perhaps add this patch:

Index: netinet/ip6.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netinet/ip6.h,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -p -r1.22 ip6.h
--- netinet/ip6.h	10 Apr 2013 00:26:22 -0000	1.22
+++ netinet/ip6.h	17 Jan 2014 22:18:50 -0000
@@ -64,6 +64,9 @@
 #ifndef _NETINET_IP6_H_
 #define _NETINET_IP6_H_
 
+#include <inttypes.h>
+#include <netinet/in.h>
+
 /*
  * Definition for internet protocol version 6.
  * RFC 2460

can you build socat with IPv6 support out of the box and it actually
works?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat