From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11034 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2014 17:58:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 11019 invoked by uid 89); 11 Feb 2014 17:58:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: northrend.tastycake.net Received: from northrend.tastycake.net (HELO northrend.tastycake.net) (212.13.201.165) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:58:08 +0000 Received: from adam by northrend.tastycake.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDHau-000663-8c for cygwin@cygwin.com; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:58:05 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:50:00 -0000 From: Adam Dinwoodie To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Maintainer for git? Message-ID: <20140211175804.GC13844@tastycake.net> References: <20140123105142.GN2357@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140125115958.GU2357@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140128111102.GM2821@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140129153546.GA3147@tastycake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00242.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:35:32PM -0500, David Conrad DavidConrad-at-acm.org |Cygwin| wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:11:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> as soon as we release the next Cygwin version 1.7.28, which is due very > >> soon now. > >> > > I've just tested this -- the clone is [...] working just fine with > > the 2014-01-28 snapshot. I've not tested the snapshot on x86_64, but I > > can try to find time to do that if it'd be useful. > > Just curious where we stand with this now that 1.7.28 is out. Does it > still need testing on x86_64? I currently have 32-bit cygwin installed > on a 64-bit machine, but I'd be happy to install 64 (they can be > installed side-by-side, correct?) if it would help with testing the > new git. You can definitely install 32-bit and 64-bit alongside each other, although if you do anything manually with your path, for example, you should be careful the installs don't interfere with each other. I've been using my Git install day-to-day on 32-bit Cygwin, mostly because that's where I have most of my environment set up, but I've been trying to test both when I've been explicitly testing my builds. Adam -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple