From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 946 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2014 19:13:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 933 invoked by uid 89); 18 Feb 2014 19:13:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:13:36 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 94D6D520A11; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:13:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:18:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin Message-ID: <20140218191334.GN2246@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <7f134d1561781b92212eb45350009593.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8iY9iRW2aj84vsbN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7f134d1561781b92212eb45350009593.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00482.txt.bz2 --8iY9iRW2aj84vsbN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1367 On Feb 18 19:44, J.H. vd Water wrote: > Hi Corinna, >=20 > >> After I had set up /etc/nsswitch.conf as follows > >> > >> db_enum: files > >> > >> the output of getpwent and getgrent looked "familiar" to me. (though t= he > >> output of 'id' is not). > > > >In how far? Did you read my text in terms of how user and group names > >are created? The leading separator char for builtin groups is an SFU >=20 > Read and understand your text completely? No. Uh, well, I graciously allow to ask questions ;) > >thingy. If it's too disturbing we can discuss changing that, but right > >now I'm still looking for some kind of similarity. >=20 > What I meant was: >=20 > The output of 'id' in my "regular setup" shows: >=20 > @@# id > uid=3D1003(Henri) gid=3D513(None) groups=3D513(None),0(root),544(Administ= rators),545(Users) >=20 > The output of 'id' in the "test setup" shows: >=20 > $ id > uid=3D1003(Henri) gid=3D513(None) groups=3D513(None),0(root),545(Users),4= (+INTERACTIVE),\ > 11(+AuthenticatedUsers),4095CurrentSession),66048(+LOCAL) >=20 > To me the second output is different - but perhaps it is not. It shows groups which are present in your user token, but which are not in your /etc/group file. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --8iY9iRW2aj84vsbN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTA7DeAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+g8m0P/16TqltsrOCOxrzDCi9EjpwY 8kMDwLx2E2p4xk/rdb4SQcqcemiDsZ8+4pvGL/FSNnQUY/1HphPRvX/2TKJiSGMx zzw8MqG3EmUhnWluo7omC0GYt6mZa23UUGGFADKZyU53chqKUIYubfZw6RnE44Jw 8Ola5kneCya9IZPRk4fUZIJY3P2NBOIQEZxuab7IhrH2AAx6H50p2uB00S6e/A+y XC/P5qRcD2W3V8JAmHVH2eZ9ecjRRgxViENRfV9rcizXyIkkdJi+h7K3VSGk+rWr 0xXrTZYxhr8BNqy/lGj8yiG6X+QR6w/zP9yzZkgZFZxwBTKpIlgT/Hq+0B7OQIeg Y2Y49zlN4fEkIPrUz6e6FuIPBQw1I3aTgwwBVdFaLoes8OXBTMvOud2/eM4fTiLA azfItl0kSikUr7cxx6SRWvnabRO+vm2QVSyZWJz80jTQJUS2oV+uno9bbaah6S1o XPWCLvw3Aq81uvnFWA2JOefLD3qactx9wlZMCiAWTH+TfUdM5B6U9kcEbD0esO/+ BALGpgphurIebtHogmzY2MG3SSaqKFEB1aIK2RSIoChPyYFcW3FGE5GN6NQC0yb0 m7PES1GMYQkb2viITXGUfbmy6iHvJcnK7fsbr0Xkt1wLUPJwFkBjATRNvIAtzb2w efCoVTttHRmZYDTU1cjK =2lGK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8iY9iRW2aj84vsbN--