From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3950 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2014 09:49:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 3941 invoked by uid 89); 27 Feb 2014 09:49:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:49:54 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4A6F4520412; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:49:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:58:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin Message-ID: <20140227094951.GD2246@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20140213143849.GH2246@calimero.vinschen.de> <87fvn7cb68.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20140225200414.GA4238@calimero.vinschen.de> <87y50zaqjb.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20140225215423.GA6065@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140226100209.GR2246@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140226135222.GW2246@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hGJHCKezBFFDTGYa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00704.txt.bz2 --hGJHCKezBFFDTGYa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1330 Hi Achim, thanks for testing. On Feb 27 09:07, Achim Gratz wrote: > Achim Gratz writes: > > "noldap" >=20 > Sorry, copied the "getgroups" data again, this is the data for "noldap" of > course: >=20 > 0.171u 0.015s 0:01.03 17.4% 0+0k 0+0io 3298pf+0w > 0.093u 0.140s 0:00.97 23.7% 0+0k 0+0io 3292pf+0w > 0.046u 0.093s 0:00.97 13.4% 0+0k 0+0io 3285pf+0w > 0.062u 0.140s 0:00.97 20.6% 0+0k 0+0io 3283pf+0w > 0.031u 0.124s 0:00.97 15.4% 0+0k 0+0io 3285pf+0w > 0.093u 0.077s 0:00.99 16.1% 0+0k 0+0io 3291pf+0w > 0.093u 0.077s 0:00.96 16.6% 0+0k 0+0io 3298pf+0w > 0.015u 0.077s 0:00.97 8.2% 0+0k 0+0io 3291pf+0w > 0.093u 0.108s 0:00.99 19.1% 0+0k 0+0io 3300pf+0w > 0.062u 0.109s 0:00.97 16.4% 0+0k 0+0io 3294pf+0w 1 second? That sounds still a bit slow. Considering that I'm now member of 414 groups, and you are member of 440 groups, the extra number of groups cannot account for that. This sounds surprisingly as if the names of some of your groups are not cached on your machine. Or something. Or is this a rather slow machine?!? Still, it seems like the right thing to do to drop the group name configuration stuff entirely. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --hGJHCKezBFFDTGYa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTDwo/AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+giKAP/iOBpt+tRBNKWoCNWLmxrRuh aIXUiqugpdQh/yLAp61SOdMtSbxkC+Q7fqkt3kDtxg3+oHotIxQky4nXEHOfSu9K myGBnvO4cObD83YSTy4JP6KKIpEAqelTeDrUgWsTqf4UMgBGEGsXarI6Brsp2avC vuGGmqG1PhEmep1kikBi/SIn7b1YnZrzNaY4HeolvIFAjxEympaUdN72NhXpDijN sV8EHZVdb9Y2fZUjOzvk55Zv2gDbgMZe+NK5E6wPtGwafYzA6XhPDc9SbqctSGbg AIGNU/A732pD6BvqbMDzmfuwTeT870CaikguMIbd8+00Lwlb6MsS4UDA6YZHc5Hg RW1t6mzpBbcSdCwGEbkHIBvtgKv9XU00hWiI93fqrUtXnDqmFLBKFC710+TS/czD ifmRTuS/XFmnm4b2eb3eQehfXqWrFkrmZA7fB39o9UExVeVEhM8Lfy3zb+b4w/K1 xCb25pPOrQK5V38lFpyhuyQZvqsxqofkbgK4yyUyfJmH9iqrSmBsjHathZvT3HZ0 Nndd3y9rvswjGXl7ncGUVIayMNLs1WWcofpLvGS18Ordxj09yHCWtNRTkT1lPLze kMVC8muEaP2SGRtebqIdypzDYmt6qMRKEd4q8JSX2P+UN1ZX44UgycbjJS3GfpGC HIe/CxW+uPU4Q8p8My5F =Hbg9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hGJHCKezBFFDTGYa--