Re: Still testing needed: New passwd/group AD/SAM integration

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1721 bytes --]

On Apr 12 10:20, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 4/12/2014 7:13 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Apr 11 19:36, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>On 4/10/2014 10:53 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>Hi folks,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>The latest snapshot, 2014-04-10, is a snapshot from CVS HEAD again.
> >>>It contains the latest crazy ideas in terms of the user and group
> >>>account creation without requiring the /etc/passwd and /etc/group
> >>>files.
> >>
> >>I installed the complete snapshot and moved /etc/passwd and
> >>/etc/group out of the way.  Now all users have gid == uid:
> >>
> >>$ mkpasswd.exe
> >>+SYSTEM:*:18:18:U-NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM,S-1-5-18:/home/SYSTEM:/bin/bash
> >>[...]
> >>kbrown:*:197610:197610:...
> >>[...]
> >>sshd:*:197613:197613:...
> >>
> >>$ mkgroup.exe
> >>+SYSTEM:S-1-5-18:18:
> >>[...]
> >>HomeUsers:S-1-5-21-2633657340-2046398995-3442950202-1003:197611:
> >>None:S-1-5-21-2633657340-2046398995-3442950202-513:197121:
> >>
> >>Shouldn't ordinary users (like kbrown) have gid == 197121?  All
> >>files I created as kbrown prior to the test show group "None", and
> >>all files I created after the test show group "kbrown".
> >>
> >>Is this a bug, or is there something weird about my system that's
> >>making this happen?  cygcheck output is attached.
> >
> >Definitely a bug.  I "optimized" the code a couple of weeks ago and
> >while I was at it I "optimized" away the code evaluating local user's
> >primary gid.  Duh.  I'm just building a new snapshot.
> 
> Works fine now.  Thanks.

Good to hear.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]