On Apr 25 13:19, David Stacey wrote:
> On 25/04/14 09:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>  There are some conditions associated with using Coverity Scan [2]. The
> >>  one thing that jumps out is that our relationship with RedHat might be
> >>  a stumbling block. We can but ask - the worst that can happen is that
> >>  they politely decline.
> >They will.  #7 won't fly due to the buyout license clause.
> 
> Would you like me to enquire anyway?

Well, asking never hurts :)

> >>  There have been a few hints on this list about a possible move from CVS
> >>  to git. If such a move were on the cards then that should probably
> >>  happen first - I wouldn't want the nugatory effort of getting this
> >>  working from CVS only to have to change it almost immediately.
> >Yeah, I'm n ot exactly looking forward to it since I'm very familiar
> >with CVS or SVN, but have nothing but trouble with git.  But since
> >everybody else is so very happy with git, I guess I'll have to adapt.
> >Teeth-gnashingly.
> 
> It might help ease your pain knowing that you can use github with a
> svn client (to a limited extent):
> https://help.github.com/articles/support-for-subversion-clients

Neat.  But I fear it's time to get used to the idea.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat