From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20937 invoked by alias); 15 May 2014 05:25:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 20917 invoked by uid 89); 15 May 2014 05:25:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org (HELO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org) (204.13.248.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 15 May 2014 05:25:51 +0000 Received: from pool-98-110-183-166.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([98.110.183.166] helo=cgf.cx) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WkoAv-0001zM-1j for cygwin@cygwin.com; Thu, 15 May 2014 05:25:49 +0000 Received: from ednor (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BC6E600D0 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 01:25:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 15 May 2014 01:25:47 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19jlPd7N7qwj6/L2Guvtsj7 Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 07:17:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Default manifest Message-ID: <20140515052547.GA3788@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <5374053E.3080007@cornell.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5374053E.3080007@cornell.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00327.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:07:26PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >Are we close to a resolution of the problems with default manifests? It >looks to me like all the pieces are in place, but maybe I've missed >something: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01387.html > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790#c9 > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807#c8 > >I'm not trying to rush any maintainers, but I'm asking because I >currently have to use a self-built version of binutils, which doesn't >provide a default manifest, because of the problem I reported here: > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-04/msg00199.html I'll update binutils ASAP. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple