From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21573 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2014 12:51:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 21564 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jun 2014 12:51:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:51:56 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4F3688E05FF; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:51:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:51:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: gecos from AD? (was Re: timeout in LDAP access) Message-ID: <20140617125154.GR23700@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20140617100011.GL23700@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140617103014.GP23700@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JvUS8mwutKMHKosv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140617103014.GP23700@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00214.txt.bz2 --JvUS8mwutKMHKosv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1238 On Jun 17 12:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 17 12:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jun 16 22:39, Denis Excoffier wrote: > > > Another (unrelated and less important) problem is that 'getent' > > > happily produces lines with some extra =E2=80=98:=E2=80=99, in partic= ular when the > > > gecos field itself contains =E2=80=98:=E2=80=99. > >=20 > > Wow, that *is* important. All fields returned from the server have to > > get their colons converted to commas. I'll fix that. On second thought, removing colons should only occur for gecos. The other fields shouldn't contain colons anyway since their content has to be POSIX-compatible anyway. So, either I add code to remove the colons from the gecos field ... > While we're at it... do we really need the gecos info? Cygwin fills > out this field with the Windows username and SID info for internal > purposes, and then adds the gecos info from AD. However, it's just > informational and usually only used by the finger(1) tool. >=20 > Shall I just remove fetching the gecos fields from AD entirely? ... or that. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --JvUS8mwutKMHKosv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJToDnqAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gNr4P/0+LlGay17Gs2Ru0zL7M+jkI PW4CU5FY1i+YG6c373cW+rZqMbVpDnUuCe0xmVYU/6TjTPg8POnVRzkSQv0v85wQ BCHwVgkSX4X4n+X8/hdKXatS5yZFBrLBX6L1ZCYrWa5JlI/C1MIj1NL7Qnb9VEfR pMbbZUSH88N94MoJMwQg0sWLMRCfhhLlMNUXX+7h5V48ZyGOeSh92GBskiZoJBQv wF2klBV4rSBYD4wKAqjprMYoCUAAvuLr4DVqC9qH5wGxi7NVmuIDM/etF13ZXeoh kGKB6eFsM3c6onN98VBgGRIZop5pK1SYys/1UOVylgxsgHEnn/7wDq0YwJ5ZhJef NntcaipB7DDAZojq+fm7b6LruMJPahRmgM7AG2d99BzCy8dfwTUGQ52x4/AD1P7/ TMPxC//5fdS+rwxOF+hJ1he2Yi43NshQjDnJ3UP4HsOSQ/DzzkmGUN60Fye4xdDx BX3cKQGpMXEzcv2GoRwiDBK9YTvPkcYusmeb6zeBuo8LaOu5UeHXKHOFvnuhQOId D7dgOETSBQhtTRdkSaRwYg6kx+9Sizq+f0QZv5Yss1Uae6jE99oH3Pi79sMP7QVz Bt6WjoB7zpl9QqPbyRze6OSO/knHKKiBj+Dkooi04bmgXe1BgwXBe1bLtSKHOtDp E0BPwOh3UUekKoVPy2el =+f0z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JvUS8mwutKMHKosv--