From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8711 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2014 19:19:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 8696 invoked by uid 89); 2 Sep 2014 19:19:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,EXCEL_ATTACHED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:19:16 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 733DC8E1402; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:19:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:19:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: (call-process ...) hangs in emacs Message-ID: <20140902191914.GG6056@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20140828095524.GO20700@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140828131832.GT20700@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140901115701.GD2644@calimero.vinschen.de> <87ppffs0kw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20140902083217.GM2644@calimero.vinschen.de> <87mwaiq6bt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zGQnqpIoxlsbsOfg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mwaiq6bt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 --zGQnqpIoxlsbsOfg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1120 On Sep 2 19:29, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > >> Installed, everything looks fine so far. > > > > Thanks for testing! Maybe you'd like to have a view into the simple > > as well as the more complex ACLs created by Cygwin? Icacls output > > is moderately easy to read. If you have questions or concerns... >=20 > I've used icacls in the past. Is there anything that you want me to > check specifically? More or less, just compare the ACLs and see if you find strange differences. This only works for the ACLs created or modified with `setfacl' and the snapshot DLL. The ACLs created or modified via setfacl with the older DLLs always were different and, I have to admit, kind of broke the default POSIX permissions created via open() or chmod(). The idea of my change was to make them always in an identical fashion. The order may only vary in secondary permissions, but never in the standard permissions, which also always come first. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --zGQnqpIoxlsbsOfg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUBhgyAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gDKMP/3Pkx3mTTDfPw97yS6+BGgM1 e1cUs8mMWRptjK63bxej7hoNGxATQWcNJhZiJUKlcoUYf0t4jffzJ1uOHAn6jPUV 9Ozg/liosU8WehyG6pQNdstmt/sH6Y5tnPEGkbbunwTgGao3+GDuPzHXXWA7qjsL RnhTIi2ka+ZXD+t8wJRas2Z8UZKWZKmD0ALO8BobdkJBWECSkyd9UHFZbCj7zecg qhdK1SqLXasYGmmG3Htp2SXoHJTEiMAu31zl35ZAeSSw/6N4UjUyi3nirbieStIR VJkQFNvCJXzCoA2EVlPMqrUSBYDX8AaXThTTIxBhs/lakAN2pjp7BYm+LGjZKJQQ d8kNkz6CsPpzvg5wd8mydZfUklFWegKzOwqlnuQngdtEMZwCCtOLIGbKkCrd6qsU c6RGabpBBMn1bnqxSQtegEHondYkpMigMjP/9cdEXXa7anw1nGB0R5ISm0EWJOJa uNMcfqIY3KY/yNuaYdsaG2DiK8ZKP4UBbli3o9mEt1V7mHS+OqIdqaOi1Vvw5Vna roDGz0Us/xyVrr1YUsuqoSjt37LbACNQ2qqEQ9Y2Bvi9oFV4sF+vPkvwExxtbznN ZFxUIvHG4U+v8nicBJ3w/T9iXrfrazlc1LfNs3YV1eOtd4SvTmryLpTLlZwQ5xLB nAOMvt+laJAePFpk9zxl =LKka -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zGQnqpIoxlsbsOfg--