Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Christian Franke]

If PATH variable is unset or does not contain /bin or /usr/bin, 
exec("/not_bin/program", ...) fails because cygwin DLLs could not be loaded.

This affects postfix which cleans the environment to the bare minimum 
for security reasons.
(fortunately there is an easy workaround, so this does not block postfix 
ITP)

Testcase:

$ cat nopath.cc
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
// #include <windows.h>

int main()
{
   unsetenv("PATH");
   // SetDllDirectory("c:\\cygwin\\bin");
   execl("/usr/sbin/alternatives", "alternatives", (const char*)0);
   perror("execl");
   return 1;
}

$ make nopath
...

$ ./nopath
/usr/sbin/alternatives.exe: error while loading shared libraries: ?: 
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Enabling the SetDllDirectory() Win32 call fixes the problem.
Would possibly make sense to add this call to cygwin1.dll.


Christian


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Eric Blake]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1453 bytes --]

On 09/12/2014 11:02 AM, Christian Franke wrote:
> If PATH variable is unset or does not contain /bin or /usr/bin,
> exec("/not_bin/program", ...) fails because cygwin DLLs could not be
> loaded.
> 
> This affects postfix which cleans the environment to the bare minimum
> for security reasons.
> (fortunately there is an easy workaround, so this does not block postfix
> ITP)
> 
> Testcase:
> 
> $ cat nopath.cc
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> // #include <windows.h>
> 
> int main()
> {
>   unsetenv("PATH");

This is undefined behavior, per POSIX.  POSIX recommends that you always
leave PATH defined to at least a bare minimum of the results of
confstr(_CS_PATH, ...); it also states that implementations are free to
do what they want (in this case, crash) if you don't follow the
recommendation:

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap08.html
"If PATH is unset or is set to null, the path search is
implementation-defined."

> Enabling the SetDllDirectory() Win32 call fixes the problem.
> Would possibly make sense to add this call to cygwin1.dll.

That said, just because POSIX has already given us the
get-out-of-jail-free card doesn't mean that we can't be nice and improve
cygwin1.dll to try and help broken programs that unset PATH.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 539 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Christian Franke]

Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 11:02 AM, Christian Franke wrote:
>> If PATH variable is unset or does not contain /bin or /usr/bin,
>> exec("/not_bin/program", ...) fails because cygwin DLLs could not be
>> loaded.
>>
>> This affects postfix which cleans the environment to the bare minimum
>> for security reasons.
>> (fortunately there is an easy workaround, so this does not block postfix
>> ITP)
>>
>> Testcase:
>>
>> $ cat nopath.cc
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>> #include <unistd.h>
>> // #include <windows.h>
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>>    unsetenv("PATH");
> This is undefined behavior, per POSIX.  POSIX recommends that you always
> leave PATH defined to at least a bare minimum of the results of
> confstr(_CS_PATH, ...); it also states that implementations are free to
> do what they want (in this case, crash) if you don't follow the
> recommendation:
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap08.html
> "If PATH is unset or is set to null, the path search is
> implementation-defined."

There is no POSIX PATH search needed in my testcase:
   execl("/usr/sbin/alternatives", ...)

The alternatives.exe could be found. The required DLLs could not be loaded.
POSIX does not specify anything about the load path of shared libraries.
On Linux, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is completely separate from PATH.
On Windows, the DLL load path is connected to PATH.

>> Enabling the SetDllDirectory() Win32 call fixes the problem.
>> Would possibly make sense to add this call to cygwin1.dll.
> That said, just because POSIX has already given us the
> get-out-of-jail-free card doesn't mean that we can't be nice and improve
> cygwin1.dll to try and help broken programs that unset PATH.

Hmm... is postfix actually broken?
Unsetting PATH is IMO sane (from the POSIX POV) if all exec() calls use 
absolute path names.

Christian


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Andrey Repin]

Greetings, Christian Franke!

>>> Enabling the SetDllDirectory() Win32 call fixes the problem.
>>> Would possibly make sense to add this call to cygwin1.dll.
>> That said, just because POSIX has already given us the
>> get-out-of-jail-free card doesn't mean that we can't be nice and improve
>> cygwin1.dll to try and help broken programs that unset PATH.

> Hmm... is postfix actually broken?
> Unsetting PATH is IMO sane (from the POSIX POV) if all exec() calls use 
> absolute path names.

If all exec() calls are made with full paths, unsetting $PATH does not improve
security in any way, but leave underlying system in an inconsistent state. As
you've witnessed yourself.
This is not limited to Cygwin1.dll, but to all other system DLL's that you
might need to load.


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@yandex.ru) 13.09.2014, <1:27>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Eric Blake]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2251 bytes --]

On 09/12/2014 02:15 PM, Christian Franke wrote:
>>>    unsetenv("PATH");
>> This is undefined behavior, per POSIX.  POSIX recommends that you always
>> leave PATH defined to at least a bare minimum of the results of
>> confstr(_CS_PATH, ...); it also states that implementations are free to
>> do what they want (in this case, crash) if you don't follow the
>> recommendation:
>>
>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap08.html
>> "If PATH is unset or is set to null, the path search is
>> implementation-defined."
> 
> There is no POSIX PATH search needed in my testcase:
>   execl("/usr/sbin/alternatives", ...)

PATH may not be needed for execl() to find the binary it will be
executing, but it IS required to be set in the environment to the bare
minimum of confstr(_CS_PATH) for that binary to have a chance of
executing in a well-defined setup.

> 
> The alternatives.exe could be found. The required DLLs could not be loaded.
> POSIX does not specify anything about the load path of shared libraries.
> On Linux, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is completely separate from PATH.
> On Windows, the DLL load path is connected to PATH.
> 
>>> Enabling the SetDllDirectory() Win32 call fixes the problem.
>>> Would possibly make sense to add this call to cygwin1.dll.
>> That said, just because POSIX has already given us the
>> get-out-of-jail-free card doesn't mean that we can't be nice and improve
>> cygwin1.dll to try and help broken programs that unset PATH.
> 
> Hmm... is postfix actually broken?

Yes, from the POSIX point of view.  It is doing something that is
documented to have unspecified behavior, namely, removing PATH from the
environment.

> Unsetting PATH is IMO sane (from the POSIX POV) if all exec() calls use
> absolute path names.

It is unspecified, whether or not it has sane behavior on some
platforms.  Just because something is unspecified by POSIX doesn't mean
that you can't do it, it just means that if you do it, and things break,
you get to keep both pieces.

So I would file a bug to upstream postfix that they are broken for
unsetting PATH.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 539 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Christian Franke]

Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Hmm... is postfix actually broken?
>> Unsetting PATH is IMO sane (from the POSIX POV) if all exec() calls use
>> absolute path names.
> If all exec() calls are made with full paths, unsetting $PATH does not improve
> security in any way,

Of course. But postfix could be configured to run "unknown" external 
programs through its various daemons. In this case, a fixed (here: 
empty) PATH improves security. If not convinced, please discuss with the 
author of postfix :-)


> but leave underlying system in an inconsistent state.

I don't see any added inconsistencies, please explain.


> This is not limited to Cygwin1.dll, but to all other system DLL's that you
> might need to load.

No. The "system" (aka "Windows") DDLs are always found due to the 
built-in defaults which *precede* PATH:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682586.aspx

The Cygwin "system" DLLs may be not found if PATH is modified/unset, 
therefore I suggested to fix this by a SetDllDirectory() call.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Eric Blake]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1157 bytes --]

On 09/12/2014 04:50 PM, Christian Franke wrote:
> Andrey Repin wrote:
>>> Hmm... is postfix actually broken?
>>> Unsetting PATH is IMO sane (from the POSIX POV) if all exec() calls use
>>> absolute path names.
>> If all exec() calls are made with full paths, unsetting $PATH does not
>> improve
>> security in any way,
> 
> Of course. But postfix could be configured to run "unknown" external
> programs through its various daemons. In this case, a fixed (here:
> empty) PATH improves security. If not convinced, please discuss with the
> author of postfix :-)

An empty PATH leaves it up to the implementation what helpers get run
(if it doesn't fall over first), which is LESS secure than a guaranteed
safe PATH of confstr(_CS_PATH).

> 
> 
>> but leave underlying system in an inconsistent state.
> 
> I don't see any added inconsistencies, please explain.

The moment you throw away the bare minimum POSIX-required PATH, you have
introduced inconsistency into the environment you are handing to your
child process.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 539 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Eric Blake]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1141 bytes --]

On 09/12/2014 05:03 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 04:50 PM, Christian Franke wrote:
>> Andrey Repin wrote:
>>>> Hmm... is postfix actually broken?
>>>> Unsetting PATH is IMO sane (from the POSIX POV) if all exec() calls use
>>>> absolute path names.
>>> If all exec() calls are made with full paths, unsetting $PATH does not
>>> improve
>>> security in any way,
>>
>> Of course. But postfix could be configured to run "unknown" external
>> programs through its various daemons. In this case, a fixed (here:
>> empty) PATH improves security. If not convinced, please discuss with the
>> author of postfix :-)
> 
> An empty PATH leaves it up to the implementation what helpers get run
> (if it doesn't fall over first), which is LESS secure than a guaranteed
> safe PATH of confstr(_CS_PATH).

By the way, passing a _safe_ PATH to your child process IS a good idea
for security-conscious programs, but you have to do it correctly (by
passing an actual safe path, and NOT by completely unsetting PATH).

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 539 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[David Boyce]

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 02:15 PM, Christian Franke wrote:
>>>>    unsetenv("PATH");
>>> This is undefined behavior, per POSIX.  POSIX recommends that you always
>>> leave PATH defined to at least a bare minimum of the results of
>>> confstr(_CS_PATH, ...); it also states that implementations are free to
>>> do what they want (in this case, crash) if you don't follow the
>>> recommendation:
>>>
>>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap08.html
>>> "If PATH is unset or is set to null, the path search is
>>> implementation-defined."
>>
>> There is no POSIX PATH search needed in my testcase:
>>   execl("/usr/sbin/alternatives", ...)
>
> PATH may not be needed for execl() to find the binary it will be
> executing, but it IS required to be set in the environment to the bare
> minimum of confstr(_CS_PATH) for that binary to have a chance of
> executing in a well-defined setup.

Eric,

I think your interpretation is wrong. The line you quote from POSIX
refers to a "path search" but there is no path search happening here.
The concept of path search is implicitly defined by the first line in
your citation:

"PATH: This variable shall represent the sequence of path prefixes
that certain functions and utilities apply in searching for an
executable file known only by a filename."

Notice the way this sentence ends. The argument to execl() is a full
path, not "only a filename", thus no PATH search is involved. I agree
that unsetting PATH is not ideal practice but I think it's perfectly
well defined by POSIX.

David

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Christian Franke]

Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 05:03 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 09/12/2014 04:50 PM, Christian Franke wrote:
>>> Andrey Repin wrote:
>>>>> Hmm... is postfix actually broken?
>>>>> Unsetting PATH is IMO sane (from the POSIX POV) if all exec() calls use
>>>>> absolute path names.
>>>> If all exec() calls are made with full paths, unsetting $PATH does not
>>>> improve
>>>> security in any way,
>>> Of course. But postfix could be configured to run "unknown" external
>>> programs through its various daemons. In this case, a fixed (here:
>>> empty) PATH improves security. If not convinced, please discuss with the
>>> author of postfix :-)
>> An empty PATH leaves it up to the implementation what helpers get run
>> (if it doesn't fall over first), which is LESS secure than a guaranteed
>> safe PATH of confstr(_CS_PATH).
> By the way, passing a _safe_ PATH to your child process IS a good idea
> for security-conscious programs, but you have to do it correctly

Agree. The postfix spawn(8) and pipe(8) daemons actually spawn external 
programs with PATH set to _PATH_DEFPATH.


> (by passing an actual safe path, and NOT by completely unsetting PATH).
>

Disagree. The postfix master(8) spawns all of its daemons with PATH 
unset. This IMO does not violate POSIX.

Note that setting PATH=/bin on Cygwin does not fix the security problem 
in the DLL search order. Even with "SafeDllSearchMode" enabled, the 
current directory is always checked before PATH. Running some Cygwin 
program from /usr/sbin, /usr/local/bin, /usr/libexec, ... would load a 
possible malicious cyg*.dll from current directory regardless of PATH 
setting. Only programs in /bin are safe.

Using SetDllDirectory("c:\\cygwin\\bin") somewhere in cygwin1.dll would 
fix this also.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Csaba Raduly]

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Eric Blake  wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 11:02 AM, Christian Franke wrote:
(snip)
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>>   unsetenv("PATH");
>
> This is undefined behavior, per POSIX.  POSIX recommends that you always
> leave PATH defined to at least a bare minimum of the results of
> confstr(_CS_PATH, ...); it also states that implementations are free to
> do what they want (in this case, crash) if you don't follow the
> recommendation:
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap08.html
> "If PATH is unset or is set to null, the path search is
> implementation-defined."

Nitpick: undefined != implementation-defined

Csaba
-- 
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
"Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds
"People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Peter Rosin]

On 2014-09-13 12:00, Christian Franke wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> (by passing an actual safe path, and NOT by completely unsetting PATH).
>>
> 
> Disagree. The postfix master(8) spawns all of its daemons with PATH unset. This IMO does not violate POSIX.
> 
> Note that setting PATH=/bin on Cygwin does not fix the security problem in the DLL search order. Even with "SafeDllSearchMode" enabled, the current directory is always checked before PATH. Running some Cygwin program from /usr/sbin, /usr/local/bin, /usr/libexec, ... would load a possible malicious cyg*.dll from current directory regardless of PATH setting. Only programs in /bin are safe.
> 
> Using SetDllDirectory("c:\\cygwin\\bin") somewhere in cygwin1.dll would fix this also.

How could a call inside a DLL fix the library search order used
to find that same DLL? Yes, it is possible (or likely) that
SetDllDirectory fixes the immediate problem for processes that
are started *by* cygwin1.dll, but it is not effective for Cygwin
processes that are started by some direct use of the Win32 API.

Also, SetDllDirectory will kill all attempts to run 32-bit
Cygwin programs from 64-bit Cygwin (and vice versa).

Cheers,
Peter


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Peter Rosin]

(sorry for replying to self)

On 2014-09-15 09:44, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Also, SetDllDirectory will kill all attempts to run 32-bit
> Cygwin programs from 64-bit Cygwin (and vice versa).

At least I think so.

Cheers,
Peter


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Christian Franke]

Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2014-09-13 12:00, Christian Franke wrote:
>> Note that setting PATH=/bin on Cygwin does not fix the security problem in the DLL search order. Even with "SafeDllSearchMode" enabled, the current directory is always checked before PATH. Running some Cygwin program from /usr/sbin, /usr/local/bin, /usr/libexec, ... would load a possible malicious cyg*.dll from current directory regardless of PATH setting. Only programs in /bin are safe.
>>
>> Using SetDllDirectory("c:\\cygwin\\bin") somewhere in cygwin1.dll would fix this also.
> How could a call inside a DLL fix the library search order used
> to find that same DLL? Yes, it is possible (or likely) that
> SetDllDirectory fixes the immediate problem for processes that
> are started *by* cygwin1.dll, but it is not effective for Cygwin
> processes that are started by some direct use of the Win32 API.

Of course, and the same is true for any non-Cygwin program. The security 
fix is effective only for any CreateProcess()/LoadLibrary() call within 
the process which called SetDllDirectory(DIR_OF_SUBSYSTEM_DLLs).


> Also, SetDllDirectory will kill all attempts to run 32-bit
> Cygwin programs from 64-bit Cygwin (and vice versa).

For programs in /bin directory, there is no problem because the EXE's 
directory is always searched first for required DLLs. SetDllDirectory() 
then has no effect for cyg*.dll search order.

For other programs it also works because Windows (at least 7) apparently 
skips 32-bit DLLs when searching for 64-bit ones (and vice versa). It is 
then required that PATH contains the other Cygwin's /bin directory.

Testcase for calling 64-bit from 32-bit:

exe in /bin:

   SetDllDirectory("c:\\cygwin\\bin");
   unsetenv("PATH");
   execl("/cygdrive/c/cygwin64/bin/uname", "uname", "-a", (const char*)0);

exe not in /bin:

   SetDllDirectory("c:\\cygwin\\bin");
   setenv("PATH", "/cygdrive/c/cygwin64/bin", 1);
   execl("/cygdrive/c/cygwin64/usr/sbin/alternatives", "alternatives", 
(const char*)0);

In both cases, the SetDllDirectory() call does not break anything.

Cheers,
Christian


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3388 bytes --]

On Sep 15 16:35, Christian Franke wrote:
> Peter Rosin wrote:
> >On 2014-09-13 12:00, Christian Franke wrote:
> >>Note that setting PATH=/bin on Cygwin does not fix the security problem in the DLL search order. Even with "SafeDllSearchMode" enabled, the current directory is always checked before PATH. Running some Cygwin program from /usr/sbin, /usr/local/bin, /usr/libexec, ... would load a possible malicious cyg*.dll from current directory regardless of PATH setting. Only programs in /bin are safe.
> >>
> >>Using SetDllDirectory("c:\\cygwin\\bin") somewhere in cygwin1.dll would fix this also.
> >How could a call inside a DLL fix the library search order used
> >to find that same DLL? Yes, it is possible (or likely) that
> >SetDllDirectory fixes the immediate problem for processes that
> >are started *by* cygwin1.dll, but it is not effective for Cygwin
> >processes that are started by some direct use of the Win32 API.
> 
> Of course, and the same is true for any non-Cygwin program. The security fix
> is effective only for any CreateProcess()/LoadLibrary() call within the
> process which called SetDllDirectory(DIR_OF_SUBSYSTEM_DLLs).
> 
> 
> >Also, SetDllDirectory will kill all attempts to run 32-bit
> >Cygwin programs from 64-bit Cygwin (and vice versa).
> 
> For programs in /bin directory, there is no problem because the EXE's
> directory is always searched first for required DLLs. SetDllDirectory() then
> has no effect for cyg*.dll search order.
> 
> For other programs it also works because Windows (at least 7) apparently
> skips 32-bit DLLs when searching for 64-bit ones (and vice versa). It is
> then required that PATH contains the other Cygwin's /bin directory.
> 
> Testcase for calling 64-bit from 32-bit:
> 
> exe in /bin:
> 
>   SetDllDirectory("c:\\cygwin\\bin");
>   unsetenv("PATH");
>   execl("/cygdrive/c/cygwin64/bin/uname", "uname", "-a", (const char*)0);
> 
> exe not in /bin:
> 
>   SetDllDirectory("c:\\cygwin\\bin");
>   setenv("PATH", "/cygdrive/c/cygwin64/bin", 1);
>   execl("/cygdrive/c/cygwin64/usr/sbin/alternatives", "alternatives", (const
> char*)0);
> 
> In both cases, the SetDllDirectory() call does not break anything.

I'm somewhat reluctant to add a call to SetDllDirectory to the Cygwin
DLL for two reasons.

- Calling SetDllDirectory with an explicit dir doesn't just add this dir
  to the search path, it also removes the CWD from the search path.
  While I agree that this is a good thing from a security POV, can we be
  sure that this behaviour isn't needed somewhere, by somebody?

- The fact that SetDllDirectory affects searching linked DLLs in calls
  to CreateProcess is undocumented.  Per the original MSDN pages,
  SetDllDirectory affects calls to LoadLibrary and LoadLibraryEx, but
  not linked DLLs when starting a child process.  The latter is only
  mentioned in a Community Addition:

  http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms686203%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

Having said that, we can certainly test this, but I'm wondering
if an upstream Cygwin patch might be ok.  Something similar has been
applied to the portable OpenSSH repository years ago, so there's
precedent.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Christian Franke]

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 15 16:35, Christian Franke wrote:
>> ...
> I'm somewhat reluctant to add a call to SetDllDirectory to the Cygwin
> DLL for two reasons.
>
> - Calling SetDllDirectory with an explicit dir doesn't just add this dir
>    to the search path, it also removes the CWD from the search path.
>    While I agree that this is a good thing from a security POV, can we be
>    sure that this behaviour isn't needed somewhere, by somebody?
>
> - The fact that SetDllDirectory affects searching linked DLLs in calls
>    to CreateProcess is undocumented.  Per the original MSDN pages,
>    SetDllDirectory affects calls to LoadLibrary and LoadLibraryEx, but
>    not linked DLLs when starting a child process.  The latter is only
>    mentioned in a Community Addition:
>
>    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms686203%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
>
> Having said that, we can certainly test this, but I'm wondering
> if an upstream Cygwin patch might be ok.  Something similar has been
> applied to the portable OpenSSH repository years ago, so there's
> precedent.

We could leave this open for now. I already added an easy workaround to 
postfix
(add PATH=/usr/bin to import/export_environment default settings).

Christian


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1991 bytes --]

On Oct  8 19:15, Christian Franke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Sep 15 16:35, Christian Franke wrote:
> >>...
> >I'm somewhat reluctant to add a call to SetDllDirectory to the Cygwin
> >DLL for two reasons.
> >
> >- Calling SetDllDirectory with an explicit dir doesn't just add this dir
> >   to the search path, it also removes the CWD from the search path.
> >   While I agree that this is a good thing from a security POV, can we be
> >   sure that this behaviour isn't needed somewhere, by somebody?
> >
> >- The fact that SetDllDirectory affects searching linked DLLs in calls
> >   to CreateProcess is undocumented.  Per the original MSDN pages,
> >   SetDllDirectory affects calls to LoadLibrary and LoadLibraryEx, but
> >   not linked DLLs when starting a child process.  The latter is only
> >   mentioned in a Community Addition:
> >
> >   http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms686203%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
> >
> >Having said that, we can certainly test this, but I'm wondering
> >if an upstream Cygwin patch might be ok.  Something similar has been
> >applied to the portable OpenSSH repository years ago, so there's
> >precedent.
> 
> We could leave this open for now. I already added an easy workaround to
> postfix
> (add PATH=/usr/bin to import/export_environment default settings).

Ok.  Or... hmm.  The fact that using SetDllDirectory disallows searching
the CWD got me thinking twice.  Security-wise it would really be the
right thing to do.  Usually DLLs are in defined search paths:

- Application dir
- Application defined dirs
- System dirs

So, what scenario would actually break by removing CWD from the search
path?  Running tests in an libtoolized project dir, perhaps?  Is that a
valid concern or did libtool already take care of this?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Eric Blake]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 793 bytes --]

On 10/09/2014 04:03 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> Ok.  Or... hmm.  The fact that using SetDllDirectory disallows searching
> the CWD got me thinking twice.  Security-wise it would really be the
> right thing to do.  Usually DLLs are in defined search paths:
> 
> - Application dir
> - Application defined dirs
> - System dirs
> 
> So, what scenario would actually break by removing CWD from the search
> path?  Running tests in an libtoolized project dir, perhaps?  Is that a
> valid concern or did libtool already take care of this?

Running a libtool project is probably unimpacted - libtool builds
in-tree dlls into a subdirectory, which is not usually the CWD.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 539 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1154 bytes --]

On Oct  9 08:25, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 04:03 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> > Ok.  Or... hmm.  The fact that using SetDllDirectory disallows searching
> > the CWD got me thinking twice.  Security-wise it would really be the
> > right thing to do.  Usually DLLs are in defined search paths:
> > 
> > - Application dir
> > - Application defined dirs
> > - System dirs
> > 
> > So, what scenario would actually break by removing CWD from the search
> > path?  Running tests in an libtoolized project dir, perhaps?  Is that a
> > valid concern or did libtool already take care of this?
> 
> Running a libtool project is probably unimpacted - libtool builds
> in-tree dlls into a subdirectory, which is not usually the CWD.

Right, and AFAICS a wrapper is created which adds the path to the
DLLs to $PATH before starting the actual executable.  So this is no
problem at all.

Any other idea what *might* be broken if we remove CWD from the 
DLL search path?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[tednolan]

In message <20141009162906.GA25389@calimero.vinschen.de>you write:
>
>Any other idea what *might* be broken if we remove CWD from the
>DLL search path?
>
>
>Corinna
>

I'm pretty sure I've got some programs loading Tcl extensions that
cd into the directory with the extension dlls, load the extension and then
change back to where ever they were.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 982 bytes --]

On Oct  9 11:46, tednolan@bellsouth.net wrote:
> In message <20141009162906.GA25389@calimero.vinschen.de>you write:
> >
> >Any other idea what *might* be broken if we remove CWD from the
> >DLL search path?
> >
> >
> >Corinna
> >
> 
> I'm pretty sure I've got some programs loading Tcl extensions that
> cd into the directory with the extension dlls, load the extension and then
> change back to where ever they were.

Hmm.  If so, it's quite a weird way to handle this, rather than
loading the modules with full path.

Is that a Tcl "feature", or is it how certain Tcl apps are implemented?
I can't really believe the former...

Assuming I create a Cygwin snapshot adding a call to SetDllDirectory in
the next couple of days, would you be willing to test if your Tcl stuff
still works?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Jan Nijtmans]

2014-10-10 12:34 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>:
> On Oct  9 11:46, tednolan@bellsouth.net wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure I've got some programs loading Tcl extensions that
>> cd into the directory with the extension dlls, load the extension and then
>> change back to where ever they were.
>
> Hmm.  If so, it's quite a weird way to handle this, rather than
> loading the modules with full path.
>
> Is that a Tcl "feature", or is it how certain Tcl apps are implemented?
> I can't really believe the former...

This is certainly not a Tcl "feature"!  The standard Tcl extension
mechanism always uses the full path simply because Tcl
cannot depend on platform-specific ways to search for
such libraries elsewhere.

I'm willing to test this;I don't believe such a change
will break anything in my Tcl environment.

Regards,
       Jan Nijtmans

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Arjen Markus]

This might the way the pkgIndex.tcl file for this particular extension
has been implemented, but like Jan says, that is not the Tcl way.

Here is a sample that illustrates the more acceptable procedure:

# Tcl package index file, version 1.0

if {![package vsatisfies [package provide Tcl] 8.6]} {return}

package ifneeded itcl 4.0b7 [list load [file join $dir "itcl40b7.dll"] itcl]
package ifneeded Itcl 4.0b7 [list load [file join $dir "itcl40b7.dll"] itcl]

The variable "dir" is set by the package management subsystem and the
effect is that the _full_ path is constructed before the DLL is
actually loaded.

Regards,

Arjen

2014-10-10 13:24 GMT+02:00 Jan Nijtmans <jan.nijtmans@gmail.com>:
> 2014-10-10 12:34 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>:
>> On Oct  9 11:46, tednolan@bellsouth.net wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure I've got some programs loading Tcl extensions that
>>> cd into the directory with the extension dlls, load the extension and then
>>> change back to where ever they were.
>>
>> Hmm.  If so, it's quite a weird way to handle this, rather than
>> loading the modules with full path.
>>
>> Is that a Tcl "feature", or is it how certain Tcl apps are implemented?
>> I can't really believe the former...
>
> This is certainly not a Tcl "feature"!  The standard Tcl extension
> mechanism always uses the full path simply because Tcl
> cannot depend on platform-specific ways to search for
> such libraries elsewhere.
>
> I'm willing to test this;I don't believe such a change
> will break anything in my Tcl environment.
>
> Regards,
>        Jan Nijtmans
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[tednolan]

In message <CAMCbSMrar1Zu4p6gN=gc8-XqE-8RUTmP3er0ujeN--CHKzCNAQ@mail.gmail.com>
you write:
>This might the way the pkgIndex.tcl file for this particular extension
>has been implemented, but like Jan says, that is not the Tcl way.
>
>Here is a sample that illustrates the more acceptable procedure:
>
># Tcl package index file, version 1.0
>
>if {![package vsatisfies [package provide Tcl] 8.6]} {return}
>
>package ifneeded itcl 4.0b7 [list load [file join $dir "itcl40b7.dll"] itcl]
>package ifneeded Itcl 4.0b7 [list load [file join $dir "itcl40b7.dll"] itcl]
>
>The variable "dir" is set by the package management subsystem and the
>effect is that the _full_ path is constructed before the DLL is
>actually loaded.
>
>Regards,
>
>Arjen
>
>2014-10-10 13:24 GMT+02:00 Jan Nijtmans <jan.nijtmans@gmail.com>:
>> 2014-10-10 12:34 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>:
>>> On Oct  9 11:46, tednolan@bellsouth.net wrote:
>>>> I'm pretty sure I've got some programs loading Tcl extensions that
>>>> cd into the directory with the extension dlls, load the extension and then
>>>> change back to where ever they were.
>>>
>>> Hmm.  If so, it's quite a weird way to handle this, rather than
>>> loading the modules with full path.
>>>
>>> Is that a Tcl "feature", or is it how certain Tcl apps are implemented?
>>> I can't really believe the former...
>>
>> This is certainly not a Tcl "feature"!  The standard Tcl extension
>> mechanism always uses the full path simply because Tcl
>> cannot depend on platform-specific ways to search for
>> such libraries elsewhere.
>>
>> I'm willing to test this;I don't believe such a change
>> will break anything in my Tcl environment.
>>
>> Regards,
>>        Jan Nijtmans

Hmm,

It's been a while, but I think it is something like the extension is
a DLL, but it depends on another DLL.  Consider for instance, mysqltcl.
If you want to deploy that, you need the mysqltcl.dll and the mysql dll,
so you either have to be in the same dir when you load the extension,
or put that dir in PATH.

Unfortunately, I can't run a test release on my work machine, or take
my work progs home.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Arjen Markus]

Right, that makes sense. There is indeed no way for the package
manager to handle that scenario without external help, such as a PATH
variable that includes the various directories these extra DLLs reside
in.

Regards,

Arjen



2014-10-10 13:22 GMT+02:00  <tednolan@bellsouth.net>:
> In message <CAMCbSMrar1Zu4p6gN=gc8-XqE-8RUTmP3er0ujeN--CHKzCNAQ@mail.gmail.com>
> you write:
>>This might the way the pkgIndex.tcl file for this particular extension
>>has been implemented, but like Jan says, that is not the Tcl way.
>>
>>Here is a sample that illustrates the more acceptable procedure:
>>
>># Tcl package index file, version 1.0
>>
>>if {![package vsatisfies [package provide Tcl] 8.6]} {return}
>>
>>package ifneeded itcl 4.0b7 [list load [file join $dir "itcl40b7.dll"] itcl]
>>package ifneeded Itcl 4.0b7 [list load [file join $dir "itcl40b7.dll"] itcl]
>>
>>The variable "dir" is set by the package management subsystem and the
>>effect is that the _full_ path is constructed before the DLL is
>>actually loaded.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Arjen
>>
>>2014-10-10 13:24 GMT+02:00 Jan Nijtmans <jan.nijtmans@gmail.com>:
>>> 2014-10-10 12:34 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>:
>>>> On Oct  9 11:46, tednolan@bellsouth.net wrote:
>>>>> I'm pretty sure I've got some programs loading Tcl extensions that
>>>>> cd into the directory with the extension dlls, load the extension and then
>>>>> change back to where ever they were.
>>>>
>>>> Hmm.  If so, it's quite a weird way to handle this, rather than
>>>> loading the modules with full path.
>>>>
>>>> Is that a Tcl "feature", or is it how certain Tcl apps are implemented?
>>>> I can't really believe the former...
>>>
>>> This is certainly not a Tcl "feature"!  The standard Tcl extension
>>> mechanism always uses the full path simply because Tcl
>>> cannot depend on platform-specific ways to search for
>>> such libraries elsewhere.
>>>
>>> I'm willing to test this;I don't believe such a change
>>> will break anything in my Tcl environment.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>        Jan Nijtmans
>
> Hmm,
>
> It's been a while, but I think it is something like the extension is
> a DLL, but it depends on another DLL.  Consider for instance, mysqltcl.
> If you want to deploy that, you need the mysqltcl.dll and the mysql dll,
> so you either have to be in the same dir when you load the extension,
> or put that dir in PATH.
>
> Unfortunately, I can't run a test release on my work machine, or take
> my work progs home.
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3040 bytes --]

On Oct 10 14:13, Arjen Markus wrote:
> 2014-10-10 13:22 GMT+02:00  <tednolan>:
> >>2014-10-10 13:24 GMT+02:00 Jan Nijtmans <...>:
> >>> 2014-10-10 12:34 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen <...>:
> >>>> On Oct  9 11:46, tednolan.net wrote:
> >>>>> I'm pretty sure I've got some programs loading Tcl extensions that
> >>>>> cd into the directory with the extension dlls, load the extension and then
> >>>>> change back to where ever they were.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hmm.  If so, it's quite a weird way to handle this, rather than
> >>>> loading the modules with full path.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is that a Tcl "feature", or is it how certain Tcl apps are implemented?
> >>>> I can't really believe the former...
> >>>
> >>> This is certainly not a Tcl "feature"!  The standard Tcl extension
> >>> mechanism always uses the full path simply because Tcl
> >>> cannot depend on platform-specific ways to search for
> >>> such libraries elsewhere.
> >>>
> >>> I'm willing to test this;I don't believe such a change
> >>> will break anything in my Tcl environment.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>        Jan Nijtmans
> >
> > Hmm,
> >
> > It's been a while, but I think it is something like the extension is
> > a DLL, but it depends on another DLL.  Consider for instance, mysqltcl.
> > If you want to deploy that, you need the mysqltcl.dll and the mysql dll,
> > so you either have to be in the same dir when you load the extension,
> > or put that dir in PATH.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I can't run a test release on my work machine, or take
> > my work progs home.
> 
> Right, that makes sense. There is indeed no way for the package
> manager to handle that scenario without external help, such as a PATH
> variable that includes the various directories these extra DLLs reside
> in.

There might be a potential workaround.  Given that Cygwin Tcl calls
dlopen to load DLLs, we have this somewhat under control.

The default DLL search algorithm searches the application dir for
dependent DLLs.  But there's a LoadLibraryEx flag called
LOAD_WITH_ALTERED_SEARCH_PATH.  When using this flag, and the DLL is
given with full path, the application dir in the DLL search path is
replaced by the directory of the DLL.  Thus, dependent DLLs will be
searched in the same dir the original DLL has been loaded from.

This could be utilized in dlopen.  If the DLL is given with no path, and
if LoadLibrary failes, create the full path to the DLL and call
LoadLibraryEx (full_path, LOAD_WITH_ALTERED_SEARCH_PATH).  DLLs in /bin
are taken care of by the SetDllDirectory call we're talking about here.

This is no 100% safe bet, I guess.  It would fail to load DLLs in
scenarios where DLLs depend on other DLLs from the current dir as well
as from the application dir, and the application dir is not /bin.  Just
how realistic is this scenario in a Cygwin environment?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3217 bytes --]

On Oct 10 17:39, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 10 14:13, Arjen Markus wrote:
> > 2014-10-10 13:22 GMT+02:00  <tednolan>:
> > >>2014-10-10 13:24 GMT+02:00 Jan Nijtmans <...>:
> > >>> 2014-10-10 12:34 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen <...>:
> > >>>> On Oct  9 11:46, tednolan.net wrote:
> > >>>>> I'm pretty sure I've got some programs loading Tcl extensions that
> > >>>>> cd into the directory with the extension dlls, load the extension and then
> > >>>>> change back to where ever they were.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hmm.  If so, it's quite a weird way to handle this, rather than
> > >>>> loading the modules with full path.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Is that a Tcl "feature", or is it how certain Tcl apps are implemented?
> > >>>> I can't really believe the former...
> > >>>
> > >>> This is certainly not a Tcl "feature"!  The standard Tcl extension
> > >>> mechanism always uses the full path simply because Tcl
> > >>> cannot depend on platform-specific ways to search for
> > >>> such libraries elsewhere.
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm willing to test this;I don't believe such a change
> > >>> will break anything in my Tcl environment.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>>        Jan Nijtmans
> > >
> > > Hmm,
> > >
> > > It's been a while, but I think it is something like the extension is
> > > a DLL, but it depends on another DLL.  Consider for instance, mysqltcl.
> > > If you want to deploy that, you need the mysqltcl.dll and the mysql dll,
> > > so you either have to be in the same dir when you load the extension,
> > > or put that dir in PATH.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, I can't run a test release on my work machine, or take
> > > my work progs home.
> > 
> > Right, that makes sense. There is indeed no way for the package
> > manager to handle that scenario without external help, such as a PATH
> > variable that includes the various directories these extra DLLs reside
> > in.
> 
> There might be a potential workaround.  Given that Cygwin Tcl calls
> dlopen to load DLLs, we have this somewhat under control.
> 
> The default DLL search algorithm searches the application dir for
> dependent DLLs.  But there's a LoadLibraryEx flag called
> LOAD_WITH_ALTERED_SEARCH_PATH.  When using this flag, and the DLL is
> given with full path, the application dir in the DLL search path is
> replaced by the directory of the DLL.  Thus, dependent DLLs will be
> searched in the same dir the original DLL has been loaded from.
> 
> This could be utilized in dlopen.  If the DLL is given with no path, and
> if LoadLibrary failes, create the full path to the DLL and call
> LoadLibraryEx (full_path, LOAD_WITH_ALTERED_SEARCH_PATH).  DLLs in /bin
> are taken care of by the SetDllDirectory call we're talking about here.

I implemented this in the latest snapshot.  It calls SetDllDirectory
on Cygwin's /bin, and dlopen addiotnally tries to load the DLL with
LoadLibraryEx(LOAD_WITH_ALTERED_SEARCH_PATH) if all else failed.

Please give the latest snapshot from https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
a try.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Christian Franke]

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> ...
> I implemented this in the latest snapshot.  It calls SetDllDirectory
> on Cygwin's /bin, and dlopen addiotnally tries to load the DLL with
> LoadLibraryEx(LOAD_WITH_ALTERED_SEARCH_PATH) if all else failed.

For some reason, the SetDllDirectory() call has no effect for exec():

Testcase:

$ unset PATH

$ uname -srvm
-bash: uname: No such file or directory

$ /bin/uname -srvm
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 1.7.33s(0.277/5/3) 20141014 19:44:03 i686

$ /usr/sbin/alternatives
/usr/sbin/alternatives: error while loading shared libraries: ?: cannot 
open shared object file: No such file or directory

$ PATH=/bin /usr/sbin/alternatives
alternatives version 1.3.30c - ...

$ cd /bin

$ /usr/sbin/alternatives
alternatives version 1.3.30c - ...



> Please give the latest snapshot from https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> a try.

No regressions found yet :-)

Christian


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1332 bytes --]

On Oct 16 23:51, Christian Franke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >...
> >I implemented this in the latest snapshot.  It calls SetDllDirectory
> >on Cygwin's /bin, and dlopen addiotnally tries to load the DLL with
> >LoadLibraryEx(LOAD_WITH_ALTERED_SEARCH_PATH) if all else failed.
> 
> For some reason, the SetDllDirectory() call has no effect for exec():
> 
> Testcase:
> 
> $ unset PATH
> 
> $ uname -srvm
> -bash: uname: No such file or directory
> 
> $ /bin/uname -srvm
> CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 1.7.33s(0.277/5/3) 20141014 19:44:03 i686
> 
> $ /usr/sbin/alternatives
> /usr/sbin/alternatives: error while loading shared libraries: ?: cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory

Weird.  The same sequence of commands works fine for me on W8,
W8.1 and W10 64 bit, under i686 as well as x86_64 Cygwin.  

[...]

but it doesn't on Vista and W7, wow.

The question now is, is it because the path given to SetDllDirectory
is not propagated to child processes on older systems, or is it
because the directory is only used in calls to LoadLibrary{Ex} on
older systems.

Stay tuned, I have to investigate this.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1701 bytes --]

On Oct 17 11:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 16 23:51, Christian Franke wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >...
> > >I implemented this in the latest snapshot.  It calls SetDllDirectory
> > >on Cygwin's /bin, and dlopen addiotnally tries to load the DLL with
> > >LoadLibraryEx(LOAD_WITH_ALTERED_SEARCH_PATH) if all else failed.
> > 
> > For some reason, the SetDllDirectory() call has no effect for exec():
> > 
> > Testcase:
> > 
> > $ unset PATH
> > 
> > $ uname -srvm
> > -bash: uname: No such file or directory
> > 
> > $ /bin/uname -srvm
> > CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 1.7.33s(0.277/5/3) 20141014 19:44:03 i686
> > 
> > $ /usr/sbin/alternatives
> > /usr/sbin/alternatives: error while loading shared libraries: ?: cannot open
> > shared object file: No such file or directory
> 
> Weird.  The same sequence of commands works fine for me on W8,
> W8.1 and W10 64 bit, under i686 as well as x86_64 Cygwin.  
> 
> [...]
> 
> but it doesn't on Vista and W7, wow.
> 
> The question now is, is it because the path given to SetDllDirectory
> is not propagated to child processes on older systems, or is it
> because the directory is only used in calls to LoadLibrary{Ex} on
> older systems.
> 
> Stay tuned, I have to investigate this.

Ok, so prior to W8, the SetDllDirectory path is not propagated to child
processes :-|

I created a patch and a new snapshot on https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
which calls SetDllDirectory during initialization of every process.
Please give it a try.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Christian Franke]

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 17 11:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Oct 16 23:51, Christian Franke wrote:
>>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> I implemented this in the latest snapshot.  It calls SetDllDirectory
>>>> on Cygwin's /bin, and dlopen addiotnally tries to load the DLL with
>>>> LoadLibraryEx(LOAD_WITH_ALTERED_SEARCH_PATH) if all else failed.
>>> For some reason, the SetDllDirectory() call has no effect for exec():
>>>
>>> Testcase:
>>>
>>> $ unset PATH
>>>
>>> $ uname -srvm
>>> -bash: uname: No such file or directory
>>>
>>> $ /bin/uname -srvm
>>> CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 1.7.33s(0.277/5/3) 20141014 19:44:03 i686
>>>
>>> $ /usr/sbin/alternatives
>>> /usr/sbin/alternatives: error while loading shared libraries: ?: cannot open
>>> shared object file: No such file or directory
>> Weird.  The same sequence of commands works fine for me on W8,
>> W8.1 and W10 64 bit, under i686 as well as x86_64 Cygwin.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> but it doesn't on Vista and W7, wow.
>>
>> The question now is, is it because the path given to SetDllDirectory
>> is not propagated to child processes on older systems, or is it
>> because the directory is only used in calls to LoadLibrary{Ex} on
>> older systems.
>>
>> Stay tuned, I have to investigate this.
> Ok, so prior to W8, the SetDllDirectory path is not propagated to child
> processes :-|
>
> I created a patch and a new snapshot on https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> which calls SetDllDirectory during initialization of every process.
> Please give it a try.

Now works.

cygwin_patches_for_postfix_count++; postfix_patches_for_cygwin_count--; :-)

Thanks,
Christian


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1973 bytes --]

On Oct 17 19:56, Christian Franke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Oct 17 11:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>On Oct 16 23:51, Christian Franke wrote:
> >>>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>>...
> >>>>I implemented this in the latest snapshot.  It calls SetDllDirectory
> >>>>on Cygwin's /bin, and dlopen addiotnally tries to load the DLL with
> >>>>LoadLibraryEx(LOAD_WITH_ALTERED_SEARCH_PATH) if all else failed.
> >>>For some reason, the SetDllDirectory() call has no effect for exec():
> >>>
> >>>Testcase:
> >>>
> >>>$ unset PATH
> >>>
> >>>$ uname -srvm
> >>>-bash: uname: No such file or directory
> >>>
> >>>$ /bin/uname -srvm
> >>>CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 1.7.33s(0.277/5/3) 20141014 19:44:03 i686
> >>>
> >>>$ /usr/sbin/alternatives
> >>>/usr/sbin/alternatives: error while loading shared libraries: ?: cannot open
> >>>shared object file: No such file or directory
> >>Weird.  The same sequence of commands works fine for me on W8,
> >>W8.1 and W10 64 bit, under i686 as well as x86_64 Cygwin.
> >>
> >>[...]
> >>
> >>but it doesn't on Vista and W7, wow.
> >>
> >>The question now is, is it because the path given to SetDllDirectory
> >>is not propagated to child processes on older systems, or is it
> >>because the directory is only used in calls to LoadLibrary{Ex} on
> >>older systems.
> >>
> >>Stay tuned, I have to investigate this.
> >Ok, so prior to W8, the SetDllDirectory path is not propagated to child
> >processes :-|
> >
> >I created a patch and a new snapshot on https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> >which calls SetDllDirectory during initialization of every process.
> >Please give it a try.
> 
> Now works.
> 
> cygwin_patches_for_postfix_count++; postfix_patches_for_cygwin_count--; :-)

You seem to like the idea... ;)


Thanks for testing,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Cannot exec() program outside of /bin if PATH is unset

[Csaba Raduly]

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Corinna Vinschen  wrote:
> On Oct 17 19:56, Christian Franke wrote:
>> Now works.
>>
>> cygwin_patches_for_postfix_count++; postfix_patches_for_cygwin_count--; :-)
>
> You seem to like the idea... ;)

Of course. He has to deal with postfix, _you_ have to deal with Cygwin.

(: Csaba :)
-- 
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
"Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds
"People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple