From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22663 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2014 21:58:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 22648 invoked by uid 89); 26 Nov 2014 21:58:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:58:18 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id D19C18E146C; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:58:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:36:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin AD schema and configuration extensions (was Re: RFC: 1.7.33 problem with user's home directory) Message-ID: <20141126215815.GE9157@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20141110205216.GJ2782@calimero.vinschen.de> <0B8D23F7-0258-472D-BF38-860402FD3CDC@etr-usa.com> <20141111101821.GO2782@calimero.vinschen.de> <20141111111437.GB28012@calimero.vinschen.de> <20141126205658.GA9157@calimero.vinschen.de> <20141126211251.GB9157@calimero.vinschen.de> <87bnntvegb.fsf@Gertrud.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bnntvegb.fsf@Gertrud.fritz.box> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00588.txt.bz2 --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1100 On Nov 26 22:28, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > Ok, so we have a cygwin schema extension now. The file is called > > cygwin.ldif and is in the Cygwin CVS repo. It gets installed to > > /usr/share/cygwin. The schema extension consists of two auxiliary > > classes: > [=E2=80=A6] > > Do you think this makes sense? Would you actually use these AD > > extensions, or do you see your admins using them if available? >=20 > This is _very_ interesting and I hope to have some discussion with our > AD admins about this. It will be some time though, there is just too > many other things going on right now. But if they allow this to be > used, I think it would indeed be possible to get rid of all local > configuration for a new install on a client machine. It would be possible for sure. The question is, would it be actually used? In some environments, schema and configuration extensions are avoided like the plague. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUdkz3AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gdpAP/2n8VzwC3NMFpDnQZo1nSJR2 ajiRT9/5iKevPqKoRtw6R9JXi+ns+vEom/ksVnrIE76hfPao2CR2c4NuY/3296T1 JPxLGyWF1qZpOJganDmPeyaPkdYEdHYKcbMxI/l2SW9A6iVZyLXWnOKfOTtIMd/s WKdroLoK4Y6tcSjlzYMiAQCYt/g7BaftXasas1AtZr2Wje1PHFwPWhPq7F3A1z5R oRNXdiRF3o6lrWvMTxP1oLJ80p0eHOFyhgxqvMFgOpFfKRsmwFKDB+bOxoYZwiWS oWIm0fW1KqMcYYxOQaG7Bhi8HLddTVv5l7pIdwDuR8bLvRIWoSJggc8Jqmwjbb0F iN+6tXqdH2MxW1+JX1lWYWOR/FIyTLoSGP+CtnHwfv7MzslrvwvtRhdRu9Jq1flS fuoezvGFLszDSjs8NBrs4bRsKNlsU7ZEeGzgpq8zhMzlyOUG/9GdngGj3YsAby8t DpMBW72sHuo5SPQhaVO4PLrwnUYDCIcX+KtY4j5rqsyKL94+cYRccaPowqsStbWS H6PFcBxo9juT11VbGDcoIavfKOfpffRDxmmdJUtsAVFFom1NTCthyx82sPZFUx5C E17e2Cu3H3N5E4ODJsguSre4kcWw8REICpzB8XINBfVJOoeWXvDduKAygMJfzPmf /le8eo682bYXv8ljBnSx =VXUf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg--