From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14744 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2015 09:35:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 14730 invoked by uid 89); 11 Apr 2015 09:34:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:34:58 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 751D8A80BEE; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 11:34:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:35:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [TESTERS needed] New POSIX permission handling Message-ID: <20150411093456.GA19111@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20150410100703.GA4401@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 953 On Apr 10 15:13, Warren Young wrote: > On Apr 10, 2015, at 4:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen = wrote: > >=20 > > This should help in Cygwin<->Windows interoperability. >=20 > That=E2=80=99s pretty vague. >=20 > Would you care to list some specific expected improvements from this > change? Are there known problem scenarios in the current world which > we can test both ways, which should behave differently under the new > DLL? >=20 > For instance, does it fix the well-known problem with chmod 600 > ~/.ssh/* resulting in mode 660 until you kick the ACLs around a bit? Yes. This has been discussed and I was originally opposing this change, but not very loudly. Other than that, please read the archives. You'll find the threads discussing this in the last two months. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVKOrAAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gvhoP/RxQbgmSo+mIn/1AU2tai+dk MI1QUm1J/vHH22dvdFTT2tWGAuYDEyfetnBSCk5EFmXSyV3rs2K6BP+9GUPtV3UC mj6z4jn6MZ+1UPmS2EpQu8y63+ve4epkR30H740+ZXJuK7Jqp+UiBciefxMBH1y4 RWgbUOPLkRllIs83p8EGErFkJB3WzKmTLYhHBkB8Yg3FTeNv2plh3T3xDOIe6/TQ XhMPfuk7CmLN+Aoq0tKaqW6mhEE0zjlEQmyz1tnmGR3D6GTOxYx8NCIbmwggEjQ2 NYh0qMuXcLbE2WCYPETTckgbmaNsDktqGvitZmppqs1LWQpewc0xbcyQXhN/XjdV Qrmgkeulbe5meOiW51Zrhgeyshw1UNGPvrgrZfxsh5qTI0p8ZgvVPKc4e/FictqH /458IjNTeE0lhYW4HVFe8Qzt7LHeO2rijzag/0BfhPzLfITOF6px/QkcLLarGVOB +h9gnmjYS+YV552Ps5jTYw+ExWpFckA4TWXjFPuwegtMPLkRBmXV0EIvy6mlQTh4 ELqyvH4skmW3f43bETEWJ+mb9S88oe0uIovBIN+3K8wpgzu7lQWo3KVVdQgOn9yo mj4UhoA1bchAr2VMZjWmZp/8y28RwStOKi3fdDQHheusucUhMttdlLgXZFGujsE7 z4MlMJkDZhqUNmlkDN0w =TAfx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--