From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 100969 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2015 07:32:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 100957 invoked by uid 89); 13 Apr 2015 07:32:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:32:08 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1D9F3A80A58; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:32:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:32:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-3 Message-ID: <20150413073206.GV7343@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20150413071750.GU7343@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f0Ums9VvOMUG7syy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150413071750.GU7343@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00262.txt.bz2 --f0Ums9VvOMUG7syy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1464 On Apr 13 09:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 12 17:19, Bryan Berns wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Corinna Vinschen > > wrote: > > > Hi Cygwin friends and users, > > > > > > > > > New 2.0.0-0.3 test release. It's supposed to fix the pty chmod probl= em > > > reported in https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00240.html > > > > >=20 > > Just a note: In 2.0.0-0.2, creating a file using touch on the root of > > one of my drives resulted in the with the Windows GUI Security tabs > > complaining about ACE order on the resultant file. I forgot to mention: Yes, that's expected for some ACLs. Cygwin tries to minimize the number of DENY ACEs, but depending on the permissions and the MASK value you end up with something like this: NULL DENY USER 1 DENY USER 2 DENY ... USER 1 ALLOW USER 2 ALLOW ... GROUP 1 DENY GROUP 2 DENY ... GROUP 1 ALLOW GROUP 2 ALLOW ... OTHER ALLOW Rinse and repeate with default (aka "inheritable") permissions. This or some other, similar technique is required to reproduce POSIX ACLs with Windows ACLs. Don't let the Windows GUI reorder them to generate the "canonical" (but incomplete) order. This is along the same lines as described in https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html#ntsec-files Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --f0Ums9VvOMUG7syy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVK3D2AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gj7YP/ilaXMxAS42plrRE7vFpLUta 7P3zoV/aOhbwpb6tFQs9ZzWWCegRryydWhrLAg1JYuRkiO9fmIAMWFCLQCy73z62 CEJiipeMmRQksiWSFNdS8rmRSzvN08VfAy4g/j6FzMUU8pDAOAgmZv4QdLPq71Zx VERmMD6psl8qGPZMK5GOuJfh9+KN3xCCdcuNpRAweyLg3SdWr3kTjfWwkYocaz1m /bq4eyLlr9U3VOIxR4ZdkzNn8dAF9IifjEN25fnfDPOdWzk+A48Xr2vNbdG8IuHl hptbjlH6V+BtiUrTogJPQu6LOSkNyl1SlXMM/8DiCde9d2WhOJpoEt2AWydX4w0i 8nCg0EV+2QLztpEfZ+xPz26QzDfjCbC72XvQNfNDqA8MAlNLU3532nPL4BWvUyS5 f5L2mR/6Lr25uz2+mZQhOMp/2q/us5w6QTTb4AfHkpR2LaThFHw8qZZ/o3zrMqHj TGiyJO0dIGTZ335cSipd9H6S7uK1eogojrgEumhZTjVp8mYeryU7ZzzzhmWfMTt9 pTmTrgnxqEzfCozJQ0boSCeY72XxQQvIOfsFv+Iqe2KNyNxBbu/nFsO94nj655xh nA3ILGOt/YkRW4Nw6nqxtgwggkSWGqxVRR3IP2jVEPcqMN69JHqY6iUoQEwAMF4H 89gXu/9FWujMDbkEuRMy =uMIi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f0Ums9VvOMUG7syy--