On Apr 14 17:01, Houder wrote:
> %% uname -a
> CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW Seven 2.0.0(0.287/5/3) 2015-04-14 10:45 i686 Cygwin
> %% pwd
> /home/Test
> %% touch alfa
> %% chmod 460 alfa
> %% echo aha > alfa
> bash: alfa: Permission denied           # no problem here ...
> 
> %% getfacl alfa
> # file: alfa
> # owner: Test
> # group: None
> user::r--
> group::r-x
> mask:rw-
> other:---
> %% icacls alfa
> alfa NULL SID:(DENY)(Rc,S,WEA,X,DC)
>      Seven\Test:(DENY)(S,WD,AD,WEA,DC)
>      Seven\Test:(R,D,WDAC,WO,WA)
>      Seven\None:(DENY)(S,X)
>      Seven\None:(RX)
>      Everyone:(Rc,S,RA)
>      Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files
> %%

This looks exactly like the ACL created by -0.3.  It produces this MASK
value.  The rest is just the logical consequence.  But it doesn't do
that for me:

  $ uname -a
  CYGWIN_NT-6.3 vmbert8164 2.0.0(0.287/5/3) 2015-04-14 10:47 x86_64 Cygwin
  $ touch alfa
  $ getfacl alfa
  # file: alfa
  # owner: corinna
  # group: vinschen
  user::rw-
  group::r--
  other:r--

  $ chmod 460 alfa
  $ getfacl alfa
  # file: alfa
  # owner: corinna
  # group: vinschen
  user::r--
  group::rw-
  other:---

  $ icacls alfa | cat
  alfa NULL SID:(DENY)(Rc,S)
       VINSCHEN\corinna:(DENY)(S,WD,AD,WEA,DC)
       VINSCHEN\corinna:(R,D,WDAC,WO,WA)
       VINSCHEN\vinschen:(R,W)
       Everyone:(Rc,S,RA)
 
The only reason I can think of is that the parent dir has default
permissions which imply the mask value already.  So, what does
`icacls . | cat' in this directory print?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat