On Apr 14 18:32, Houder wrote:
> > On Apr 14 17:26, Houder wrote:
> >> >        Everyone:(Rc,S,RA)
> >> >
> >> > The only reason I can think of is that the parent dir has default
> >> > permissions which imply the mask value already.  So, what does
> >> > `icacls . | cat' in this directory print?
> >>
> >> %% icacls . | cat
> >> . NULL SID:(DENY)(Rc,S,REA,X,DC)
> >>   Seven\Test:(F)
> >>   Seven\None:(RX)
> >>   Everyone:(RX)
> >>   NULL SID:(OI)(CI)(IO)(DENY)(Rc,S,REA,X,DC)
> >
> > As I thought.  There's a mask value already in there which influences
> > how the default permissions are inherited.  You created this dir with
> > Cygwin 2.0 already, right?  Remove the masks with
> 
> You created this dir with Cygwin 2.0 already, right? Correct! I did not
> occur to me to start all over again ...

No, me neither, sorry.

> >   $ setfacl -d m:,d:m: .
> >
> > and try again.
> >
> >>   CREATOR OWNER:(OI)(CI)(IO)(F)
> >>   CREATOR GROUP:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX)
> >>   Everyone:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX)
> >
> > This *should* work now.  I fear you have to remove the masks from
> > all files and dirs created by Cygwin 2.0.  Sorry, but that's what
> > testing is for ;}
> 
> No problem at all ...
> 
> Btw, I will only report back on this in case you are INcorrect above.

Uhm... I wouldn't be too unhappy to get positive feedback as well...


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat