From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 96654 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2015 12:00:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 96638 invoked by uid 89); 6 Sep 2015 12:00:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 12:00:46 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 37196A804D8; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 14:00:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 12:00:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Sshd behaving strangely... Message-ID: <20150906120044.GD27066@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <1975013611.1485306.1441487005702.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WChQLJJJfbwij+9x" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1975013611.1485306.1441487005702.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 673 On Sep 5 21:03, Zdzislaw Meglicki wrote: > Greetings, >=20 > I have installed Cygwin on a Windows 8.1 Enterprise workstation.=20 > It is a most recent full download of the whole Cygwin suite (within > a week or so). Here are the relevant numbers: > Windows 8.1 Enterprise Ver 6.3 Build 9600=20 OpenSSH 7.0 (and thus the current 7.1) deprecated a couple of old and insecure ciphers. Probably that's the reason. Have a look at the release announcement: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-08/msg00021.html Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV7CrsAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+geyYQAIZ88MV+kVYQSIX18NiMXDLt U5Epy+ObJR1Z1HBE5Nsyh2pG5y2M9cihrfEbhmtbTlShMk7SEiVlwiIUjA7eANAp i+5Wx0sKs4oMD2ymIFgiZuYi95dKGHjPLki30yZW8HhDZAK+TKX3hZfM5aRvziu2 i04MgvUS7FZc1cjtnFxT+8QWQ8KqE2TxtNFjv1X+S8Zd3CjqzdzgSBTkL3nULNUB XA5OHZUSfSa2iPzlylx9JsYn7RmQ9YeDR/vcvHF1UWcl2mert9UfNc9vNFdX5VhR tCeSMXHM8B379cQUZRpUNtI9PvIN/eTBC8vka0mtdLGGUX61+hr0SYGIZo7eGRII T3UkZwv/wNo59WziqqVpETB7mKu9VrAC7fKl8vS2pfjodkuN/QboN3a07YW4M9/6 JXe5hU5q3WBkEZoTlC1S6ChtwxfaBVbr8XzZQsn7BwV7oCsJ1sMkVwTT3eLPbNF1 dC8h0YGZ2NlOxpd+ohHT5U0jYRT93YfNYcd453r7UnCYypgzRrdEw/xCThxlNrG3 RtNYJfbnshIaGNSwB4uCP2YIFtFqz6OrkX2LvWVFUIaEB7a5cuevw2ir8infvh8t nrAmDDKI5GFonkU7mpk3QXJSw3TN715Eagp3QGeAyAJfHsmMdke5dmns6pcTXDAo ZGi/5pVkkYtw3hVA6ZWt =CD0c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x--