From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 35569 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2015 10:36:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 35552 invoked by uid 89); 26 Oct 2015 10:36:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:36:04 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2A315A80613; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:36:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:15:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: problems with to_string not declared in this scope Message-ID: <20151026103602.GD31990@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <562C6940.1050404@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2 --UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1296 On Oct 25 11:25, Michael Enright wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:31 PM, JonY wrote: > > > > On 10/25/2015 01:00, Michael Enright wrote: > > > > > > I sometimes wonder what would be involved in fixing this. > > > > > > > Full C99 *printf support. Corinna answered on the same thread > > https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2015-01/msg00245.html > > >=20 > Yes, but what I was wondering about was the first couple of levels of > detail below that, i.e. which algorithms, having yet to be coded in > newlib, are needed to enable long double textification in newlib? I > know practical methods for textifying integers but as far as I know > floats are harder. Maybe I could use the parable of the stone soup and > get the work rolling by offering a filename? ldtostr.c Textifying the numbers is not the problem, there's already the ldtoa functionality. Missing the set of long double functions is. I think it's not the GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF, but the _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 flag or something like that. JonY? It would still be nice if somebody with a bit of math knowledge would contribute the missing long double functions to newlib. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWLgISAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gQcwQAJZV4LfbRLy0VsOQZv0hxbx6 hMlJlrPJTYdEFP3cu1JO2/ZF9v7+qe9cj3ZWf5YgGuVV/koH5wGEHqCfE6nre0CP QWN1UfH1eiKkFO4s95MAXJyZVDItVp5GwiRnAm+QbUVMJAtgqajYYiYWfiEz81JK YY9xWd7wbzZOMQTdTU0gGon/Z/uclHAMlFe/U/M+UgjoUl7QDOypBOFgg7mZaxYp S+wInr5p/pDG6zEfI1KCVR4i+XGDaArigobhLtqPn/TktjNJhnyDPb32D1GzocWy kzEs+UEU3qJH0AspAni3mzEb3yzmb4bLHDVxCHkjiqBJhpAnfxFeQpnDoad3Oyg9 9aO7Y/DMDqe3FDVe+OcJV65NWXUKYnA2knnLOr8fbGVajaKEBTnug2RQwdKKMFKq O2CkSoKxZhiQ9w50SF1UMgsi/K9CGnVADqNkZmq0YSuEnwejXrGKguiZ4RwOtBL7 XAVsyZXxwuKeSP4h/HC/EoHRarMtikqFvbXXky0MDihG+lg4xNWjTAZcGfaTqyAp oVhTQA+tIJTG7c12XlX74+2uO3TxHsyVP+raMXVu+MJ+fdklgCWYeFgwjGVIpXsq RMEd7yxR+Y2RWKVaRXIaTYjC7cXUop0/I7kNK8nYlknfVrL0RYC8MwYSt+zTqNAE 6/PD971ddeEKvFpyX0wl =xyQw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6--