From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 92849 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2015 11:24:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 92825 invoked by uid 89); 16 Nov 2015 11:24:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:24:00 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id D0008A80673; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:23:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:24:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: 2.3.0: possible Cygwin flock bug (Windows 10 x86_64) Message-ID: <20151116112357.GC6402@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20151112122809.GB1774@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 873 On Nov 13 13:25, Mario Roy wrote: > Hello Corinna, >=20 > I am writing to confirm that file locking, with MCE 1.608, utilizing > the development snapshot 2015-11-12 x86_64 is passing 100%. I ran > through other test cases including mixing threads and child processes. Thanks for testing and confirming. I uploaded the new Cygwin 2.3.1 already on Saturday. > [...] > MCE 1.700 in Github runs well with channel locking across the board. > However, being able to obtain a shared lock (possible with file > locking) at the application level is nice. Seeing the above example > work makes me confident in bringing back file locking and know that it > will work across platforms including Cygwin. Sounds good. Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWSbzNAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+ggFwP/jjPrlrt0qB3QwoHqZcNTZzK quC6oOa+yD5V0+Tx0wFj3DNyjqRp4wJjHAHM8LcuTqKteI/wF6WsakThthVt7YQD 8fCNIeGNqGqW86pQ8RSnIRSC+4HJ33RyNcDmPmXjLdJAEo95CTCTh5lEWhUkC79I fUDrFAEHUvP1KGqG2KId73NDh7MKRLmKBXYYzA6ZFETsX9dkRiCErXBGcQ0tBuB0 3eJl/w5BFPfzhIpn/cquIPw4Xbtb13CTR5NTUx4z/zTqI0LrM7QLradiQetxfo7z 2r3f7GjywKFd6SW4fF0Do2MAXUUFd6hrzAIb+fhBJ9yBlmgZ9H7i5ne8sJ9QmpSt V272u8pS8OOYVlP014xZcMt19G+Lz2ze/JsXEEDB14mwQi0IJZBaiYcnYbDcXRoz SdBKE2rw5m0dctyeZbx13mzlMQ/yAUy6auuFiFiLfzbjY8MjdwuFqwBuPpHMsdbm Jo6VYRYpnVwhzlvDO6G9bsfp11XC/FPfDj5Xq0/RgK8mM35ycpFTd836Uh5xCsxy U7aR3WQk/GZ/QJZzRZH/tJxGqeZ0wkuCUEZF8IO6GDlRY4RFXIkzzUj/uJlbLjxl Rc/9rjpSdFK0V24YvWKP1QWVauzyegUl0xx/eVsScrqXjjo2u591Q8Ja0eQS5jbl QprcJdZxSShWEMfS3kDK =imPF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--