From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80302 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2015 23:00:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 80285 invoked by uid 89); 2 Dec 2015 23:00:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc02fe8.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.47.232) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 23:00:13 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6D634A804A4; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 00:00:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 23:00:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: fork issue when lauching cygwin64 process from 32bit native app on Windows 10 TH2 Message-ID: <20151202230011.GI18447@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <565D762E.4090109@gmail.com> <20151201112037.GU2755@calimero.vinschen.de> <565D8D88.4080601@gmail.com> <20151201140105.GW2755@calimero.vinschen.de> <565DDB8E.1090609@gmail.com> <565E14BA.60204@gmail.com> <20151202221521.GH18447@calimero.vinschen.de> <565F7405.8060908@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="da4uJneut+ArUgXk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <565F7405.8060908@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1041 On Dec 2 16:43, Ren=C3=A9 Berber wrote: > On 12/2/2015 4:15 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >=20 > > Along these lines, is anybody here still running a 64 bit Windows 10 > > which has *NOT* been updated to 1511? If so, I just need the output > > of a call to `cat /proc/self/maps' once for comparison. >=20 > Under 64-bit Cygwin: >=20 > [...] Thanks a lot! Does anybody have the same info for 32 bit W10 updated to 1511? I have the exact opposite info available right now :} > $ uname -a > CYGWIN_NT-10.0 T7400 2.3.1(0.291/5/3) 2015-11-14 12:44 x86_64 Cygwin >=20 > I don't know were you can see the specific Windows version, but AFAIK it > hasn't been updated recently (the System Info only shows "Windows 10 > Pro", 64-bit). That's oh so funny: The good old system info doesn't show this anymore. But you can look into the new-style "Settings" -> System -> About. Thanks again, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWX3f7AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gNOMP/1382/nEeTe6HcEMl18uQFnL GsOETYkr6lHIECDYMqrwvZNPFHNOkxXorpoOF1H4oUorVhTowcw3Q2WhkrakRWnG tlU/a4MSQMv13nkqycPgT+3C7I1nD6pK+cyJZGI5mCUmC4voAk8mrso5CB3k02zb KZkk+qXomZGPsE7KcNLHXTO29B/J2amCqC5px9yXs+bgA5AuShgAOPv1ByQeoggO qF792WzHuA3IlnSvX0k69VotkYRJpqjb/hhhxBrkYTXCjjr9wX8+v/wBsf/PxejM eITJBcTYnTTlO4k9gWUjfa2q1O6pF1IZ6/nzulDvMMPHPhWpXOPdrMolQ75hEOeP 36ZiQLeO+Vf7pjvJ5PAQ7GGykdXJGA9WoMF9aIjx6g8jVHlIGip2GbECcgG69qHC afXEEy2trY/YyWVe6RDT6cV+D99R5ccfckRcWsocj4xVOMZOnVq5gHKy7pQBzwgG Me+YsVwMLad1xrGHO6Tz6La4aE4BC9I8pkpJaOMc4dT3a+41Pfg82SDC477ytUoI 9jXeNtebmwNmOkjQ2dkDpoEBuhOasJ6kCeiEsGyzQLnmkNZPIsUmagGvf91VL063 Qj57EcOUgBn+ODytYE2rbbMVJvhDTawIE8Srd1V0Wgd1jC431W1Z71CQAkN3Htyv yq0mOEV12Gte7itvObqp =SWxq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --da4uJneut+ArUgXk--