From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 116970 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2015 19:04:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 116959 invoked by uid 89); 6 Dec 2015 19:04:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc02fe8.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.47.232) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 19:04:24 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 437DFA8062A; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 20:04:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 19:04:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.3.0-0.4 Message-ID: <20151206190422.GB18409@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <87io4bucep.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20151206140852.GB17433@calimero.vinschen.de> <87a8pntzua.fsf@Rainer.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a8pntzua.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 --RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 890 On Dec 6 15:29, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > >> VPN access with the worst possible terrestrial roundtrip has been test= ed > >> for the same case now and goes from 52s to ~1700s or a factor of 33. = So > >> roundtrip delay adds an additional factor of about 3, but the server > >> response time seems to play the dominant role even in that scenario. > > > > Uhm... is that good or bad now?!? Do you still think adding this > > functionality is a good idea? >=20 > For most of the things I did it worked OK, so I still think AuthZ should > be used. Ok, thanks a lot. I'm just wondering if I should really push this to stable state, given the fact that I won't be available starting next week until 2016-01-06. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWZIa2AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gQc0P/jEIUoIxGVSIBbMIpU9hG7zW s2R3g1VOmUEpRoGsPpbV+axlIuIO24uqTHFRheNf+gvvNrVSxB1PJ37rZmv+cnOu pBB2e23YQTBplMOLuJXnqre5IdFh+CguF25+PGUff8YkY84lZ78voe2S8HAx+IrU y6+PtaRwsNeIZ7QPuLXiJWJ6ldQB8QiPAZpa7ohncWeyUzNIcuBHadiJKBtl5r5z tuMrQFBbuOQU47GRE224lfK3zqlc0auuTsFZxA4SAEyAP3tzStrfA42y+GK4sHS3 siZ+NZZ0Q5LG9tLpadketa2GEPPX7RTDjE4nvI5pEUQaGqVUaeLAuYyzF38XkCSs j9rhcqyOUxBG77e+kBm0LRrIU8U8WxZRteh7KB8OzYukfQGrU6Zt9lUF7iX8n12e wDt2FkU1+pXGPxi4FWuNNxM+3v+EgqTsdemR+M6cGu2jIH7GM4GsyGygzz0+oN2z bVwqejOeJZ5peHTY8Biv2L4G/1308SW9PKIQhlJ4XYz9i2wUqcN46FetVBaD5C21 pesRSuHGFlsc3Qlr2IzkpXIGnjqlTU11LSuY5x9c4RHL9kkH6MjwlReW57wv/Xeb ISzbK2zw5B/QYUn1tMRlvcmQhS5yoUNCJowUf2wLljOzOSICTJB/FlQw515v8tC0 rtDWQaak58URfxMk43cb =TBLr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS--