From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 69082 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2016 14:44:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 69064 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jan 2016 14:44:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-94.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KHOP_DYNAMIC,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1451, ace, aces, Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:calimer X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc0d020.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.208.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:44:31 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id C572FA80389; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 15:44:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:11:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: chmod failed: Invalid argument Message-ID: <20160128144429.GC27369@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="raC6veAxrt5nqIoY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00423.txt.bz2 --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1491 On Jan 28 15:24, Rainer Blome wrote: > (Apologies for not using the reply feature, I was not > subscribed when the last mail was sent. I am now subscribed.) The "In-Reply-To" is still missing in your mails, so you're invariably breaking threading. T'would be nice if you could make your mailer behave :) > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jan 28 01:27, Christopher Cobb wrote: > >> Or maybe chmod is broken, like it is on my machine: > >> $ chmod 777 x > >> chmod: changing permissions of =C3=A2x=C3=A2: Invalid argument >=20 > > Can you please send the icacls output of the current directory and > > the icacls out for the file x? >=20 > Here are the icacls outputs for the test case: >=20 > $ umask > 0027 >=20 > $ mkdir bar > $ cd bar > $ icacls . > . hostname\username:(I)(OI)(CI)(F) This... doesn't look like an ACL created by Cygwin. If you're running Cygwin 2.4.1, the acl should always at least contain ACEs for the default POSIX perms, plus a NULL ACE: foo NULL SID:(DENY)(Rc,S) VINSCHEN\corinna:(R,W,D,WDAC,WO) VINSCHEN\vinschen:(R) Everyone:(Rc,S,RA) For directories also inheritable default perms for "CREATOR OWNER" and "CREATOR GROUP". Is that really a Cygwin mkdir?!? And then, what about this unknwon group with gid 213? What does $ getent group 213 print? Something's weird here... Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWqilNAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gcbsP/Rn9Kf8HuHzl8CbnOtyKjFkH pGFmxqEPfarvYcNQlA92uJpCMzoa2pjehsioCA38FVk539ik2idnvRXAp/wFo9PP I3V9pA/SLCW1mQK+nONgYjdrGm1omH2uebNZz3wA/mOfwtJ/v3zhf9hRWG6S/sKX Au8E//7X66SKbOro+KAvkpeTbd4gcEvCJ/shabmsmS4B1ho/IgLOnFfL3A23Bhss iXmWpo+x03RMuys7atyGNoHPIawPBKLK5tIXdhFT3A2ItgSYtT9hvzrwvvOcm/ml l2KqkOlL7Nk32RBUoQ5PrYDuA+hjNR9s5QKvAJw47MOqtk7cAuE/XeMtBK1gmRUs wD1VjOW/OSxNrvaAar+cyDdmmpVjVBn2oFYeWU+MqmkY4b1IhcaXTs0iwHcVBW/o grR6SGE3ZxwaaGHJB/7NZbmTsLULMxqIniyP9EwbMjZKIOChi0yPP9InrZbNyH/w /K7UU5g7KVYsbtpYoq8LI/Rmb9qHPHGF63NbL1W14ruCplb9XYO6E9hdCdRm5SiV 7atCA7+LW2nkWS1ugayU6Neu6s3b6r/umJHAIn+9nFjHdcyY2CPgwnCtD7aojmIK dW3/erqE7z7iUK29mhpZ2RO2JW/j1E4sW0qhcPr1krGhcj8qXT23KsCXFYZTSp1z mu01WTgRDIMNGAy8KUkc =U0w/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY--