From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94208 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2016 13:18:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 94177 invoked by uid 89); 8 Feb 2016 13:18:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-95.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*R:D*cygwin.com, Hx-languages-length:1041, H*R:U*cygwin, H*i:sk:CAFo71_ X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc0d020.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.208.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:18:37 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 24AACA8055C; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:18:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:18:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Problem with new acl code and cdrtools Message-ID: <20160208131835.GC12975@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1058 On Feb 8 12:01, Ismail Donmez wrote: > Hi, >=20 > cdrtools has some code to detect Solaris style ACLs: >=20 > #if defined(HAVE_ACL) && defined(HAVE_FACL) && \ > defined(HAVE_ACLFROMTEXT) && defined(HAVE_ACLTOTEXT) > # define HAVE_SUN_ACL 1 /* Sun UFS ACL's present */ > #endif >=20 > Since cygwin still seems to be defining aclfromtext() and acltotext() > functions (which are not defined in POSIX) cdrtools thinks this a > Solaris-style system and get up getting a compile error later on. Probably due to including sys/acl.h. Does swtiching to cygwin/acl.h help? Or changing the above check to prefer POSIX ACLs over Solaris ACLs? > Since we are switching to POSIX ACLs it would be nice to remove > Solaris-only ACL functions. We can't do that for backward compatibility. The Solaris function have to stay available, not the least for Cygwin's getfacl/setfacl which still use them. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWuJWqAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gYsIQAILiozKbvjkRHp9BIAtzTiUY eAzhXzegBeQMjVK6rAF4gKl7Yex6e74E4szkrmcF/yWgUVgQCHqfmuZVMlAqN5kb BdOLOI5QWffkL4d5AlwKcYrpobyACWjmhpwAr97ImFGmQLqFnmBgUwDVLBtkqxZz X7nyEQFr7D3VCOXip/P9h3k/MqR4yEBI4+6yPTrvMNAAnRA+/ms930idfWSU3pZs r4vYlZ7UD9WSt7RQKW1ucLoOyNOABcsC3Q/vqxZIzNWpokTMiSpqcMUR/vKPVC3p bnh65YLGx+GmxYjrHKVZcu5H+eOlYZcuHhpepSrrK+xJMyPCpPLui7gwcgs0HbHE cQoOiirxaDI7pbn08+3D+Ltl1Z41huboNh9Fj6pGxN6v1DAnJVOCGAXMNp9oJ5l/ JDTcEmYcE+MQn5ABgxfckROz/jov0B/AobJ8dgcQGHghUmNGxmWkZoEDSc8MgmNI rlFvzdoj6AZB59c+ECXGS9SrFcOnCfoW/iDRff/I6AEB03oZ8LWRPasQ00Fn1nbY 7GclBnRrh9CAMMhEekBvf4ENFq9N+POI4ulk7qpiAy8QvvzS7PZr67QOQ8hxmvPP CkWZLENg/WDWL5pKx7R3F9qUcCp5puvLZRCJsPskdSZxvLEwe9kuaiL3Swl3Mx1i 0togj8+U796upEvIUI4D =WXio -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh--