From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Problem with new acl code and cdrtools
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160208143630.GG12975@calimero.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFo71_57DCPp=DF9FzH1=suFuu-J4MAoObC8y=3nVujGHThqJQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1980 bytes --]
On Feb 8 16:13, Ismail Donmez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Corinna Vinschen
> <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 8 15:31, Ismail Donmez wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Corinna Vinschen
> >> <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com> wrote:
> >> > On Feb 8 12:01, Ismail Donmez wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> cdrtools has some code to detect Solaris style ACLs:
> >> >>
> >> >> #if defined(HAVE_ACL) && defined(HAVE_FACL) && \
> >> >> defined(HAVE_ACLFROMTEXT) && defined(HAVE_ACLTOTEXT)
> >> >> # define HAVE_SUN_ACL 1 /* Sun UFS ACL's present */
> >> >> #endif
> >> >>
> >> >> Since cygwin still seems to be defining aclfromtext() and acltotext()
> >> >> functions (which are not defined in POSIX) cdrtools thinks this a
> >> >> Solaris-style system and get up getting a compile error later on.
> >> >
> >> > Probably due to including sys/acl.h. Does swtiching to cygwin/acl.h
> >> > help? Or changing the above check to prefer POSIX ACLs over Solaris
> >> > ACLs?
> >>
> >> This is a generic code so I don't want to add a cygwin specific
> >> dependency there. Is there a preprocessor definition for cygwin
> >> version? I could use that to disable HAVE_SUN_ACL for cygwin 2.5+
> >
> > If you include cygwin/version.h you could use the version definitions.
> >
> > Alternatively we could allow to use the Solaris ACL functions even if
> > only including sys/acl.h, given some macro:
> >
> > sys/acl.h:
> >
> > #ifdef __USE_OLD_SOLARIS_ACL_FUNCTIONS
> > # include <cygwin/acl.h>
> > #else
> > [...POSIX definitions...]
> > #endif
> >
> > Would that help?
>
> That should help, I cook a patch and send to cdrecord maintainer.
Wait, that's a bit premature. I'm not even sure yet if the macro name
is ok.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-08 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 10:02 Ismail Donmez
2016-02-08 13:18 ` Corinna Vinschen
2016-02-08 13:31 ` Ismail Donmez
2016-02-08 14:10 ` Corinna Vinschen
2016-02-08 14:14 ` Ismail Donmez
2016-02-08 14:36 ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2016-02-08 16:10 ` Ismail Donmez
2016-02-08 19:24 ` Yaakov Selkowitz
2016-02-09 9:36 ` Corinna Vinschen
2016-02-08 16:29 ` Peter Rosin
2016-02-08 17:00 ` Ismail Donmez
2016-02-09 4:14 ` Warren Young
2016-02-09 7:57 ` Ismail Donmez
2016-02-09 8:46 ` Warren Young
2016-02-09 8:50 ` Ismail Donmez
2016-02-09 8:57 ` Peter Rosin
2016-02-09 9:06 ` Ismail Donmez
2016-02-09 10:13 ` Peter Rosin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160208143630.GG12975@calimero.vinschen.de \
--to=corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).