From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 59496 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2016 10:05:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 59080 invoked by uid 89); 16 Mar 2016 10:05:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-93.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=D*fujitsu.com, UD:conf, nsswitch.conf, nsswitchconf X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from ipbcc0d020.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (188.192.208.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:05:38 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id CCDBCA80685; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:05:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:05:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Problem with ssh-host-config? Message-ID: <20160316100536.GC15577@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <869e15d0ccf54bd5ac85e8896f61592e@R01UKEXCASM112.r01.fujitsu.local> <20160311154058.GC31269@calimero.vinschen.de> <74652658081042b6aed140a56c397df0@R01UKEXCASM112.r01.fujitsu.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f+W+jCU1fRNres8c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <74652658081042b6aed140a56c397df0@R01UKEXCASM112.r01.fujitsu.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00304.txt.bz2 --f+W+jCU1fRNres8c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 973 On Mar 15 15:42, Nick.Battle@uk.fujitsu.com wrote: > Hi Corinna, >=20 > >> In theory this should only happen if you *only* use passwd in > >> /etc/nsswitch.conf. If you use default settings (passwd db), this > >> branch should not be hit either. > >> > >> So I wonder how your /etc/nsswitch.conf looks like. Are you using=20 > >> > >> passwd: passwd > >> group: passwd > > > > We install the following in nsswitch.conf just before running ssh-host-= config: > > > > passwd: files > > group: files=20 > > db_home: windows > > > > Does that explain the path we're taking? >=20 > Looking at the csih scripts, that would take the code into the mkpasswd b= ranch with the bug. > So perhaps no one has noticed this before simply because the default beha= viour skips it. Yup, makes sense. Thanks for checking. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --f+W+jCU1fRNres8c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW6S/wAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gnMEP/3KeU17e3f9+JVaN9JqOwtMW jNNBoADn2pb/YRVYFb6hdUHnDMlDbybD5nITp0SHojWE8JXsJIK1zGeMyI749Ntd uT3qsQy7RTI/0n+Xeqd7Duo6Q4ZVyDzWCQSKHxFoxMkb31fcJgZwIk84v1KsNHf6 IjxhjZ3q2toSC9mXG7CDjT2pmHBWaol14VHPnYcFXa0mfoKTOcdkMo2u+sbpEJ0H AW9VeNQOxXs3ErKqX3nOfl+lg4nC37NX1yR21zowBwQCR4o+5xJblnFTpP8RMlgQ yQBKk0aHQx7jtQ/0hp+m2gzAh2JkOub8Ju5D0w5YKKHMl2a9k4N/LmYn6PRh8QEK p6FVU6gy8VVeIhgdnA9dhghK6U1o13rXHwNktrU1tQYUmkyFmgtdH10Aaw3GWXGv PO4zhOVtMLEhdVEN13yqCiUnTiWbNdXsuGxQSnEjSTF+RlKaW7v7vxtgxMckumUN /5s5Z4ITXGxbPtEdJOnmO/ZbUTUtfOXRLMXza20utEnpUEcE+VSFOBmbCIa1cfFc biRMcdwAkigVI/0t1eIVBBL1AUjv+PchJQZrSPaMdnbz7DRfiNS85wOSxtJa64Is ZVa8g9ixQKEmSBhI4jHWqs0MOGu1cq951c01cHbnx8Y8NAJzYACdajcC8RoAgvPh WXgre62W2pEWarApAokd =Vihw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f+W+jCU1fRNres8c--