From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76725 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2018 09:25:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 76713 invoked by uid 89); 4 Apr 2018 09:25:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=symptoms, denis, personal X-HELO: mout.kundenserver.de Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (HELO mout.kundenserver.de) (217.72.192.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:25:33 +0000 Received: from calimero.vinschen.de ([217.91.18.234]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue105 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4HXH-1eDc9A19yV-00rnAd for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:25:31 +0200 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9E172A818CB; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:25:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:25:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: accept: Bad address Message-ID: <20180404092530.GM2833@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <1342436895.1365392.1522798965341.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1342436895.1365392.1522798965341@mail.yahoo.com> <641856e3-338d-72b7-194b-da6073bf2c5f@maxrnd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Epv4kl9IRBfg3rk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <641856e3-338d-72b7-194b-da6073bf2c5f@maxrnd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:j9H1jL27Thk=:st0P9TYb++kX/RRfWq9dXZ ClRuE9IEVc03XaBXouEXMJwzEM4E3TyCuzIvcyrGjVcL/E8oEju3sCWyW+66kCIRgfNgc5hsm Rw0GNrO5PQB+tXKxxcDjK4C485fC0Y0sU/WrFaWIBuvy/JruTM1Y89Lv9WMDeyekpmXx7YwNu wtWVtWCqMy4fliLazdUYmYid4cVskKCFGTu4vn5FI8yNUDhuoZ4Ez1KFEzBj1gCmbmdLEQjpw zieDQCOuyKgUesktX5LbJlAAP2cPRdDjSntvB002vS9Qxyur/KGpTYfj64PAgpb8/S638zhcF +fakyrBfaKDO829SzY5h8ktHTj4DB8eXMs5Qs5DpEUTAjDDtBWNNkS4/b66KsnbfS7Kd/KcuF YRluBfyvIeQRXp9BJi4zOvSNIaDmSGV4DK2qdjcTUAN2IBOw2OzY89qvypKRhh1SVfiKMVRJ6 Jw2ouRBEukYlQTwGgyHmRSYlSJ97qZt3YolQHokbASZ8iCf5doNehoCPZ8YGsC87Dyp8vO5M6 6ICdkxhc9z85Z2p/qVjkkbb2eKLgj3aUV2yx6DP8lYW7AQxb/H/KCKOks9VEkzS63z4q23JVN pUHOurknpc8WWPIq4R/AgrZNlEt8kwRVtygUJyLNGez8FNz4ix9wlVKEBrmoJ9+mk6HYaYqS4 mFoPu5dEi56yT6signeHUXidP9QZygc4fW0p2v75CsaSwuPnOqj3DtnY+2J/iB0k7PncrCsYt tMj72BeSZvRW8iMlBRZXA4XWY3R81fjEmOpCUA== X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 --4Epv4kl9IRBfg3rk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1569 On Apr 3 22:59, Mark Geisert wrote: > Ilguiz Latypov via cygwin wrote: > > Hello, > >=20 > > The latest Cygwin 64-bit release with the snapshot cygwin1.dll copied o= n top of it shows an "accept: Bad address error" in 3 reproducible cases: > >=20 > > (a) The sshd daemon on receiving a connection request. > > (b) The XWin server on receiving a connection request from an X11 clien= t such as xterm. > > (c) The Python server receiving a TCP connection in the socket's accept= (). >=20 > That is likely a different problem with similar symptoms. >=20 > > A StackOverflow question 41018644 from December 2016 showed an example = of the bug with the Python server (c). >=20 > There seems to have been a brief period of time in March where accept() w= as > not working properly. There was one report on the list (from Denis > Excoffier) and at the same time it wasn't working for me, also using X, o= n a > personal build of the Cygwin DLL from git source. Denis later reported it > working again, and I can confirm it is working again for me. I reshuffled lots of socket code to make room for a new AF_UNIX implementation. While at it, I screwed up in a few places, so socket code was broken for a bit. The OpenSSH testsuite helped a lot to find the bugs, btw :} > Corinna or somebody else with the chops/access, could we get a new Cygwin > DLL snapshot built when you have a chance? New snapshots are up. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --4Epv4kl9IRBfg3rk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 833 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEoVYPmneWZnwT6kwF9TYGna5ET6AFAlrEmgoACgkQ9TYGna5E T6BDYxAAmEcbjGIQ+/3gYf+5QQ1/L3lsfMCcU29bg52vXmIx3PNalXwrowbl59xd yoPKCBj1/qsS0et5fMG/jywY/5pl12pCimtAF43iMKY+I+0SrPQ0F0EOQHUeVzo1 6kOIHrykxkssCFnewdJ0C1nQxlOY2ly1tZiU7hDfm6kFWIRmWzesjWS8Kw5uOAFA plwIl5/7EFs4jiVgnfyLptIyFT4YHn146oWOWIk2f4ON1zFtwFmGaBjX9PJ3b8PB JQlbtI4cpPBPowGU83/QERI+5pBPawTYNTiDU8//yeHSwvBr6eNKucnjxvMgA45V DqiN9yabmjoFeDvST1fe8VYjYIDHCUVLmWWYc9FKMMvdzU6x8+WkUyLT2bGyQL+u g7KlRCPZCOVpQE9mg1MxM0P+/14M8NI9yxezLct/TYKV6l9SZ+ijK0dxVA1KsLvE 7XBUDWwJcePa0/jnTsnDKfpagSVmpcz/3WkRa8c3xvMF7w84be2oVPwvenggJLAk SX3KzCOSQtHwklkVUN6IJUaXOF9US07izMymSTUw0gS9eo28PlEYoFSXi9dLHq1P NBP7dXEsjjLaegYBOaiBtrgoq79+ojfk2/xjc/3EF6IKe3O6ph6GJ7U7cTlYePr5 tLyYMnp76JjDKr69gnglcJE1z+TCviPXIl4EqDQBx+kf66Z9Nbo= =ysU2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Epv4kl9IRBfg3rk--