From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 73433 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2019 18:27:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 73425 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2019 18:27:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*F:D*com.au, H*M:local, HX-Languages-Length:1040, wherever X-HELO: mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au Received: from mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au (HELO mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au) (211.29.132.246) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 18:27:00 +0000 Received: from dimstar.local.net (unknown [49.176.30.160]) by mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 97A4D43E04F for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 04:26:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: (qmail 12839 invoked by uid 501); 9 Sep 2019 18:26:54 -0000 Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 19:05:00 -0000 From: Duncan Roe To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Command line processing in dcrt0.cc does not match Microsoft parsing rules Message-ID: <20190909182654.GA12686@dimstar.local.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <135817606.20190906233445@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 Hi Eric, On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:57:21AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 9/9/19 11:47 AM, Stephen Provine via cygwin wrote: > > Argh, my mistake about top posting again. My email client does not help me > > with this by default and I have to manually construct quoting of previous > > responses and delete what shouldn't be there (and missed it again). If there's > > any way for someone to delete my previous message from the archive, please do. > > > > Why doesn't Cygwin utilize Github or something else more modern to manage issues? > > Just because it is "modern" does not necessarily make it better. > > https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.en.html > > ranks github as worse than gitlab, in part because there is no way to > use the full power of github without surrendering to the use of non-free > software. No problems with that. I think though, that the OP's point was to use *git* (wherever the repo may be). Cheers ... Duncan. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple