From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C301386F023 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:14:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0C301386F023 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx D4BE740096 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 spammy=paste, H*r:unknown, H*M:cgf, reduce Received: by cgf.cx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:14:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:14:04 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: Brian Inglis Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Two naive questions Message-ID: <20200420201404.GB10790@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Brian Inglis , cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20200417174902.GA32412@iguana.crashland.org> <169450016.20200417211620@yandex.ru> <20200420172017.GA17660@iguana.crashland.org> <9d2da84a-61db-ea3e-a70b-9e8b2e42fe4f@SystematicSw.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9d2da84a-61db-ea3e-a70b-9e8b2e42fe4f@SystematicSw.ab.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NEUTRAL, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:14:08 -0000 On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:59:08AM -0600, Brian Inglis wrote: >The new server ml archive does not seem to offer the metadata available on the >previous server and archive, and that is true of most archives that do not allow >replies: probably a good way to reduce space required by 50-90%, from what I can >see. >A subscribed user could provide you with the reply References header values. This is a text cut and paste from https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/ The Cygwin Archives You can get more information about this list. Archive View by: Downloadable version April 2020: [ Thread ] [ Subject ] [ Author ] [ Date ] [ Gzip'd Text 110 KB ] Notice the "Gzip'd Text ..."? That's the mbox formatted email archives.