public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [Attn: gcc maintainers] Re: unhandled C++ exceptions not propagating
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:13:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200817181359.GI3272@calimero.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9525d8c2-74af-5c04-8a04-d84df4b1f2ef@cornell.edu>

On Aug 17 13:36, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> On 8/16/2020 6:38 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > One further comment, and then I'll shut up
> 
> I lied.

...which is ok.

> > and leave it to people who know what they're talking about: In the
> > 64-bit case, the function _Unwind_RaiseException in libgcc/unwind-seh.c
> > gets called, and it calls the Win32 function RaiseException as follows:
> > 
> >    RaiseException (STATUS_GCC_THROW, 0, 1, (ULONG_PTR *)&exc);
> > 
> > Then the following comment appears:
> > 
> >    /* The exception handler installed in crt0 will continue any GCC
> >       exception that reaches there (and isn't marked non-continuable).
> >       Returning allows the C++ runtime to call std::terminate.  */
> > 
> > Apparently this doesn't actually happen.
> 
> I'm beginning to think this is a bug in the Cygwin build of gcc.  The file
> unwind-seh.c is compiled on 64-bit Cygwin because __SEH__ is defined.  But
> it makes assumptions, such as those in the comment quoted above, that are
> not valid on Cygwin.
> 
> In fact, if you look at the main exception handler on Cygwin
> (exceptions.cc:626), it is clear that the exception code STATUS_GCC_THROW
> does not lead to continuation.  It falls under the default case:
> 
>     default:
>       /* If we don't recognize the exception, we have to assume that
> 	 we are doing structured exception handling, and we let
> 	 something else handle it.  */
>       return ExceptionContinueSearch;
> 
> [STATUS_GCC_THROW is 0x20474343, which shows up in the gdb output above as
> an unknown target exception.]
> 
> So it seems to me that either Cygwin's exception handler has to learn to
> handle the exception codes defined in unwind-seh.c, or else gcc should be
> built with __SEH__ undefined.
> 
> JonY, Achim, Corinna, am I missing something?

This stuff isn't really my strong point.  IIUC the above comment correctly,
we might get away with adding another case to the exception handler switch:

  #define STATUS_GCC_THROW 0x20474343
  case STATUS_GCC_THROW:
    return ExceptionContinueExecution;

Did you try that, by any chance?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-17 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-15 23:38 David McFarland
2020-08-16  3:25 ` JonY
2020-08-16  3:53 ` Takashi Yano
2020-08-16 13:21   ` Ken Brown
2020-08-16 13:52     ` Takashi Yano
2020-08-16 14:56       ` Ken Brown
2020-08-16 22:38         ` Ken Brown
2020-08-17 17:36           ` [Attn: gcc maintainers] " Ken Brown
2020-08-17 18:13             ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2020-08-17 18:44               ` Achim Gratz
2020-08-17 19:06               ` Ken Brown
2020-08-17 20:40                 ` Ken Brown
2020-08-17 20:50                   ` Ken Brown
2020-08-18  0:09                     ` JonY
2020-08-18  0:20                       ` Ken Brown
2020-08-18  1:46                         ` JonY
2020-08-16 14:17   ` David McFarland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200817181359.GI3272@calimero.vinschen.de \
    --to=corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).