From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.246]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E01394504F for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 00:31:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B3E01394504F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=optusnet.com.au Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dunc@dimstar.local.net Received: from dimstar.local.net (n49-192-70-185.sun3.vic.optusnet.com.au [49.192.70.185]) by mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 23757825D9C for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:31:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: (qmail 14564 invoked by uid 501); 26 Sep 2020 00:31:21 -0000 Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:31:21 +1000 From: Duncan Roe To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Problems with native Unix domain sockets on Win 10/2019 Message-ID: <20200926003121.GJ29986@dimstar.local.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <2b0aeab4-983d-e1d7-301f-edfeeb38cc85@oracle.com> <97d2b3af-224a-6873-fb4a-55a0ae9cd379@cornell.edu> <3e3cfe17-7fda-b063-4885-9114db9e748d@cornell.edu> <70b5577f-2cf1-0110-5d3b-cb2bd8ee6df2@cornell.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70b5577f-2cf1-0110-5d3b-cb2bd8ee6df2@cornell.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=YKPhNiOx c=1 sm=1 tr=0 cx=a_idp_d a=zRnOCfNoldqEzXEIOSrMkw==:117 a=zRnOCfNoldqEzXEIOSrMkw==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=reM5J-MqmosA:10 a=RSmzAf-M6YYA:10 a=qbo3zOxhOo-1gPCmXK8A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 00:31:26 -0000 On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 04:30:45PM -0400, cygwin wrote: > On 9/25/2020 2:50 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: > > On 9/25/2020 10:29 AM, Michael McMahon wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 25/09/2020 14:19, Ken Brown wrote: > > > > On 9/24/2020 8:01 AM, Michael McMahon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 24/09/2020 12:26, Ken Brown wrote: > > > > > > On 9/23/2020 7:25 AM, Michael McMahon via Cygwin wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I searched for related issues but haven't found anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am having some trouble with Windows native Unix domain sockets > > > > > > > (a recent feature in Windows 10 and 2019 server) and Cygwin. > > > > > > > I think I possibly know the cause since I had to investigate a > > > > > > > similar looking issue on another platform built on Windows. [SNIP} Perhaps the question here is: "Is it a bug that Cygwin rm can't remove a file system entry that no Cygwin program can create?" HTH Cheers ... Duncan.