From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
Received: from conssluserg-01.nifty.com (conssluserg-01.nifty.com
 [210.131.2.80])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FAA63840C0C
 for <cygwin@cygwin.com>; Thu,  4 Mar 2021 11:50:24 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0FAA63840C0C
Received: from Express5800-S70 (y085178.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp
 [118.243.85.178]) (authenticated)
 by conssluserg-01.nifty.com with ESMTP id 124Bnxav028161
 for <cygwin@cygwin.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 20:50:00 +0900
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-01.nifty.com 124Bnxav028161
X-Nifty-SrcIP: [118.243.85.178]
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 20:50:00 +0900
From: Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: segfault on 32bit cygwin snapshot
Message-Id: <20210304205000.4ac34afe1a8b767ea2986291@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <CAB8Xom-HwxH9LnbLL8cAoXh60tjU592T6XFEDJzvhv28Do-UsQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9d7b9dc2-cb92-498b-7655-e9c618114c87@gmail.com>
 <20210221072954.db2dcbd523ed366e4dfcb0d0@nifty.ne.jp>
 <7480c946-8e02-aba2-c06f-6b39f630699f@gmail.com>
 <20210301095546.dce31a474bd0cec2c3518f87@nifty.ne.jp>
 <20210301212542.8b1749f92af62c01b008f25a@nifty.ne.jp>
 <20210302200308.62db4fe01f78fb35a538784f@nifty.ne.jp>
 <YD5eXbxBWbUUSwcM@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <20210303185621.b048287526901af6a4c8200a@nifty.ne.jp>
 <YD9sSea32T7GqlJr@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <20210304180534.7c3825e6ee989a2bf62f0652@nifty.ne.jp>
 <CAB8Xom-HwxH9LnbLL8cAoXh60tjU592T6XFEDJzvhv28Do-UsQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:50:29 -0000

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:11 +0100
marco atzeri wrote:
> I have no problem to patch Python to solve the issue,
> but I have not seen evidence of the dlsym mechanism .
> But of course I an NOT and expert in this field.
> 
> If someone looking to the code can give me some hints,
> I will appreciate

I am also not sure where the dlsym() is used in python.
At least, os.uname() works in python 3.8.7 and 2.7.18 in my
environment even without that snippet. It seems that os.uname()
does not use dlsym(). Do I overlook something?

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>