From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lucy.dinwoodie.org (b.8.0.0.8.9.b.0.2.f.0.9.2.a.d.b.d.a.0.2.5.1.e.d.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa [IPv6:2001:8b0:de15:20ad:bda2:90f2:b98:8b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 894113858D28 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:34:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 894113858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dinwoodie.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dinwoodie.org Received: from adam by lucy.dinwoodie.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nLpAS-001I3i-4O for cygwin@cygwin.com; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:34:36 +0000 Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:34:36 +0000 From: Adam Dinwoodie To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Trouble trying to compile apache2 Message-ID: <20220220163436.x24jwpu44b2vt345@lucy.dinwoodie.org> References: <20220215123941.yxesbunapq3gaxgq@lucy.dinwoodie.org> <20220216104043.v5epaz37dk7zbhx4@lucy.dinwoodie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP, RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:34:39 -0000 On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:37:00PM +0000, Jon Turney wrote: > On 16/02/2022 10:40, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: > > > > Inevitably a bunch of other maintainers will have their own way of doing > > things; I think Scallywag is the closest thing we have to a common CI/CD > > setup. But hopefully some of this might give you pointers to CI/CD > > tools that require minimal setup and won't even cost you time on your > > own build servers. Or, at the very least, ideas about what you'll need > > to do for your own automation. > > I have no great attachment to the current system. It saves me a bit of time > maintaining my packages, and might be of some benefit to others. > > Long-term, the ambition would be to stop maintainers uploading locally built > packages, because that's not a good idea. > > If you have ideas on improvements which could benefit all package > maintainers (or even everyone who wants to try to build cygwin packages), > and would like to work on that, let me know and I'll sort out access to > sourceware for you. I'm definitely interested! This sounds like the sort of thing I'd think is a fun time. I don't think I can commit to doing anything on any particular time frame, but I think I'd enjoy working on that sort of infrastructure project and I'd be very glad to contribute.