From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from conssluserg-02.nifty.com (conssluserg-02.nifty.com [210.131.2.81]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A1923858D28 for ; Sun, 1 May 2022 00:52:03 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4A1923858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp Received: from Express5800-S70 (ak044095.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [119.150.44.95]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-02.nifty.com with ESMTP id 2410pXRw008875 for ; Sun, 1 May 2022 09:51:33 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-02.nifty.com 2410pXRw008875 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.ne.jp; s=dec2015msa; t=1651366293; bh=WNjrUmPVjtZixOJ5pxRFO0V/BJkcd7eZHw3ERNvU8Lo=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=B8VVin+UcRh0Zdz6OynCk+LaxrswvG38hUeTpbMxSa8ZqVpC0B4nvMY64DDBWFfH1 Yt2yki4GWI+USB0iWw8g46AopWsJHRJguNGS+9vto5yLLAEUqB2mdM0yUmRhRdkCOw JMbIHLezDqRDeD3zJiEHnWekD3nu2K+fIGYRf1F+NDsd+1RBH9DFREfkmqQ83zhdwO iIro9mx7Ov7sHbhkPIa8SM4Urr4L8dxGPURk2TNn1N3+XJtABrh+Iqt1wSf4PWoHCB xzJUgF4DeJnPLNGz1zDsTQqXlUdGockF+Xa0fUhmmKIZsV8UduydxoGEfrDNFfmKWj LnGX69N8wbTGQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [119.150.44.95] Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 09:51:41 +0900 From: Takashi Yano To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: GNU make losing jobserver tokens Message-Id: <20220501095141.b7e39c9f08e413d49aa4fdc2@nifty.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: <9b9da583-124d-9d5f-4c10-6622602ca8dc@oracle.com> <20220401174551.820cbc148852554108397e03@nifty.ne.jp> <20220427231340.0bdab2d6d903dd4fb44bd12f@nifty.ne.jp> <20220429000152.1fe838469e543a69586e194d@nifty.ne.jp> <20220429181010.01940adc0cdbabf976997a6a@nifty.ne.jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 May 2022 00:52:07 -0000 On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:51:03 -0400 Ken Brown wrote: > On 4/29/2022 5:10 AM, Takashi Yano wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:32:22 +0200 > > I tried to move sigproc_init() call from dll_crt0_0() to > > fork::child() for 64bit cygwin, however, that causes hang > > at cygwin startup. > > > > Am I missing somehting? > > I've never looked into the Cygwin startup code, so just ignore me if what I say > is nonsense. > > Currently sigproc_init is called either from dll_crt0_0 or from dll_crt0_1, > depending on the value of dynamically_loaded. What would happen if you always > call it from dll_crt0_1, right after > > cygwin_finished_initializing = true; Thanks for the advice. That causes hang on cygwin startup due to fork() fail :( -- Takashi Yano