From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from conssluserg-01.nifty.com (conssluserg-01.nifty.com [210.131.2.80]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8888B3858406 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2022 00:23:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8888B3858406 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp Received: from HP-Z230 (ak044095.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [119.150.44.95]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-01.nifty.com with ESMTP id 2690Mojf013070; Sat, 9 Jul 2022 09:22:50 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-01.nifty.com 2690Mojf013070 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.ne.jp; s=dec2015msa; t=1657326171; bh=VZ5NFAqQMKd1khk7nsH2OD9M20E1Yw3gtWaX8FO5BBc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AJv0d+7QV6H47LJb/OPgZ/tzXupnnamUs9mUfnfZT10A+GUdWOzqW2Wr8LiOh3u2x RZay3wxZfwKSjdtqJ9Fdk8rPh2CE1c5O6MA/ExIbTHNH4mTWhQWXzOlO3hba72PN8A YQ3CSGxezz9k5522PZEuHDK+d59QKURzjyaPuQ0MMieDH1aypWWmUI5bW47U/MdgJo pl8+Y4ZfgaU5U5zQA5kP/E4FH+1puXXTVQqN+hkEi0aiQb/1l1cJAX1CoM+0Ltbepn urAzEgWCaEpp++cMN2c8eq4D1COa1rtWbfEAIF+y5Om879sDp5+7zeMLFemEF6hOoN wyXbsngQOvl+Q== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [119.150.44.95] Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 09:22:51 +0900 From: Takashi Yano To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: dumper does not produce core that gdb recognizes? Message-Id: <20220709092251.a7a946962f44576fc915168c@nifty.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: <308d675e-84a8-6d53-6ea9-a5a3abb258c6@cornell.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2022 00:23:45 -0000 On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 23:09:27 +0000 "Lavrentiev, Anton \(NIH/NLM/NCBI\) \[C\] wrote: > > Try using a more recent gdb. I just tried your test case with gdb-12.1-1 > > (available as a test release), and it seemed to work. > > Thanks for the quick response... Though I'd rather not use test releases. The latest version of gdb that is not a test version is 11.2. But you are using 9.2. > The dumper binary and gdb in my case are supposed to be consistent with each other > (installed from the set of release packages on the same day via setup)... So I don't > really understand the discrepancy here: are you saying that dumper can produce a core > that current gdb cannot read? But that's bizarre! Even if so, the combination of latest dumper.exe (in cygwin 3.3.5 package) and gdb 11.2 do not have such a problem. Therefore, we have nothing to do for that. -- Takashi Yano