From: Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Possiblly bug of cygwin1.dll
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:16:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240122201602.0a172f5965821f6e8d6afb96@nifty.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Za48HKcCwgYSLQdY@calimero.vinschen.de>
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:57:48 +0100
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 22 10:25, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Jan 22 12:30, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > > PATCH2: (for cygwin)
> > > Avoid handle leak caused when non-static pthread_once_t is initialized
> > > with PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT
> > > diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc b/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc
> > > index 7bb4f9fc8..127569160 100644
> > > --- a/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc
> > > +++ b/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc
> > > @@ -2060,6 +2060,9 @@ pthread::once (pthread_once_t *once_control, void (*init_routine) (void))
> > > {
> > > init_routine ();
> > > once_control->state = 1;
> > > + pthread_mutex_unlock (&once_control->mutex);
> > > + while (pthread_mutex_destroy (&once_control->mutex) == EBUSY);
> > > + return 0;
> > > }
> > > /* Here we must remove our cancellation handler */
> > > pthread_mutex_unlock (&once_control->mutex);
> >
> > I see what you're doing here. Wouldn't it be simpler, though, to do this?
> >
> > diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc b/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc
> > index 7bb4f9fc8341..7ec3aace395d 100644
> > --- a/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc
> > +++ b/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc
> > @@ -2063,6 +2063,7 @@ pthread::once (pthread_once_t *once_control, void (*init_routine) (void))
> > }
> > /* Here we must remove our cancellation handler */
>
> Strange enough, this comment accompanies the code since its inception
> in 2001. It says explicitly "remove" the cancellation handler.
> That sounds like the idea was right, just the programmer forgot about
> it afterwards...
I am not sure what 'cancellation handler' means here. Is it the
event handler in pthread_mutex_t?
--
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 13:44 Takashi Yano
2024-01-19 14:28 ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-01-20 4:18 ` Takashi Yano
2024-01-20 5:13 ` Takashi Yano
2024-01-20 9:13 ` ASSI
2024-01-20 12:24 ` Takashi Yano
2024-01-20 12:46 ` ASSI
2024-01-21 11:10 ` Takashi Yano
2024-01-21 13:30 ` ASSI
2024-01-22 3:30 ` Takashi Yano
2024-01-22 9:25 ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-01-22 9:57 ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-01-22 11:16 ` Takashi Yano [this message]
2024-01-22 11:49 ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-01-22 12:41 ` ASSI
2024-01-22 14:54 ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-01-22 11:06 ` Takashi Yano
2024-01-22 11:42 ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-01-23 3:24 ` Kaz Kylheku
2024-01-24 11:55 ` Takashi Yano
2024-01-24 13:05 ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-01-24 13:11 ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-01-24 20:37 ` Kaz Kylheku
2024-01-24 20:08 ` Kaz Kylheku
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240122201602.0a172f5965821f6e8d6afb96@nifty.ne.jp \
--to=takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).