public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Bogus exit code 127 from a child process
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:58:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240318135826.e4176868074e074eb3138cb5@nifty.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240318120906.ccac3ad237a8f6c4c1b94c71@nifty.ne.jp>

On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:09:06 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 14:10:55 +0100
> Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 17 Mar 2024, at 13:50, Dimitry Andric <dimitry@unified-streaming.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 17 Mar 2024, at 13:35, Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com> wrote:
> > > ...
> > >> 
> > >> I also test your test case:
> > >> while bash -c 'true & true & wait -n || { echo 1: $?; exit 1; } && wait -n || { echo 2: $?; exit 1; }'; do echo $((i++)); done
> > >> in Linux (Debian 12.5), and the issue reproduced!
> > > 
> > > Yeah, same here with bash 5.1.16(1)-release on Ubuntu 22.04. It errors out with 127 after ~50-200 loops.
> > 
> > Having built bash master (bash-5.2-27-gf3b6bd19) here, it consistently gives 127 in this area:
> > 
> > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git/tree/builtins/wait.def#n227
> > 
> >    211  #if defined (JOB_CONTROL)
> >    212    if (nflag)
> >    213      {
> >    214        if (list)
> >    215          {
> >    216            opt = set_waitlist (list);
> >    217            if (opt == 0)
> >    218              WAIT_RETURN (127);
> >    219            wflags |= JWAIT_WAITING;
> >    220          }
> >    221
> >    222        status = wait_for_any_job (wflags, &pstat);
> >    223        if (vname && status >= 0)
> >    224          builtin_bind_var_to_int (vname, pstat.pid, bindflags);
> >    225
> >    226        if (status < 0)
> > => 227          status = 127;
> >    228        if (list)
> >    229          unset_waitlist ();
> >    230        WAIT_RETURN (status);
> >    231      }
> >    232  #endif
> > 
> > So for some reason, wait_for_any_job() returns a negative value in this particular situation.
> 
> Line 218 looks also suspicious.

Probably, this is not a bug. man bash says:
              If  the  -n option is supplied, wait waits for a single job from
              the list of ids or, if no ids are supplied, any job, to complete
              and returns its exit status.  If none of the supplied  arguments
              is a child of the shell, or if no arguments are supplied and the
              shell  has no unwaited‐for children, the exit status is 127.

If the background process exited before calling 'wait -n', it returns 127.
This is very different from wait() system call, which is necessary for
any background joubs, otherwise zombie remains.

In the shell, it is not necessary to call wait command for background jobs,
therefore exit status of the background job which already exited is not held
anymore.

So, actual bug is in the test case.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-18  4:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-17  8:14 Alexey Izbyshev
2024-03-17  8:44 ` Takashi Yano
2024-03-17  9:01   ` Alexey Izbyshev
2024-03-17  9:27     ` Takashi Yano
2024-03-17 10:03       ` Alexey Izbyshev
2024-03-17 10:21         ` Takashi Yano
2024-03-17 12:03           ` Takashi Yano
2024-03-17 12:15             ` Takashi Yano
2024-03-17 12:35               ` Takashi Yano
2024-03-17 12:50                 ` Dimitry Andric
2024-03-17 13:10                   ` Dimitry Andric
2024-03-18  3:09                     ` Takashi Yano
2024-03-18  4:58                       ` Takashi Yano [this message]
2024-03-18 11:08                         ` Alexey Izbyshev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240318135826.e4176868074e074eb3138cb5@nifty.ne.jp \
    --to=takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).