public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cygwin application hangs on closing console
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 00:32:09 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240629003209.d0bd3cc2961891fb69b55b35@nifty.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240628211726.c131e0a300046d1fa46f6b53@nifty.ne.jp>

On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 21:17:26 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> Sorry for very late replay.
> 
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 15:20:32 +0200
> Johannes Khoshnazar-Thoma wrote:
> > We did more testing and it looks like the name of the event
> > that signals console master thread start and end is shared between
> > unrelated processes (it uses the console minor which is always (?)
> > 0 when running from a powershell).
> > 
> > So since it is a two-state event (as opposed to a semaphore)
> > in theory the following can happen:
> > 
> > Process A	Process B
> > SetEvent(e)
> > 		SetEvent(e)
> > Waitforevent(e)
> > 		Waitforevent(e)
> 
> This should not happen. Master thread is unique to console.
> get_minor() number is always 0 for the first opened console.
> If you open another powershell window and start cygwin process
> while the first cygwin process is still active, the get_minor()
> returns 1.
> 
> Waiting for thread_sync_event is executed only
>   if (shared_console_info[unit] && con.owner == myself->pid)
> con.owner is in the shared memory which is shared among all
> processes started in the same console. Therefore, only the
> one process start to wait the event.
> 
> > The second SetEvent does nothing. As a result the
> > later Waitforevent is stuck (which is what we observe).
> > 
> > So the question is: why should this event be used in
> > unrelated cygwin processes? Is there a technical reason
> > we don't understand (yet) for doing that (sharing the event).
> > 
> > We patched cygwin to use pseudo random event names (the
> > tm_usec field of gettimeofday()) and the stuckness vanished.
> > So unless there is a reason for sharing the event between
> > cygwin processes this patch should work:
> 
> Do you really confirm that your patch resolves the issue?
> If so, the cause might be some kind of race issue.

There was similar bug in cygwin 3.5.1, however, it has been
already fixed in 3.5.3.
https://cygwin.com/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc5e9525453fea7c27b0e13635ae54abaa0db69d

I believe your problem is reproducible with 3.5.3. Right?

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-28 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-22 12:50 Johannes Khoshnazar-Thoma
2024-04-22 18:51 ` Takashi Yano
2024-04-23  9:20   ` Johannes Khoshnazar-Thoma
2024-04-23 10:26     ` Takashi Yano
2024-05-15 15:37       ` Johannes Khoshnazar-Thoma
2024-05-15 15:48         ` Johannes Khoshnazar-Thoma
2024-05-15 20:24           ` Brian Inglis
2024-05-21 16:23             ` Johannes Khoshnazar-Thoma
2024-06-03 13:20               ` Johannes Khoshnazar-Thoma
2024-06-28 12:17                 ` Takashi Yano
2024-06-28 15:32                   ` Takashi Yano [this message]
2024-07-01 11:47                     ` Johannes Khoshnazar-Thoma
2024-07-01 13:20                       ` Takashi Yano
2024-07-01 13:36                       ` Takashi Yano
2024-05-16  9:14           ` Takashi Yano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240629003209.d0bd3cc2961891fb69b55b35@nifty.ne.jp \
    --to=takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).