From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailsrv.cs.umass.edu (mailsrv.cs.umass.edu [128.119.240.136]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5AE3877016 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:29:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org EE5AE3877016 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cs.umass.edu Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=moss@cs.umass.edu Received: from [150.203.106.61] (dhcp-liversidge61.anu.edu.au [150.203.106.61]) by mailsrv.cs.umass.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3B3E401C1A2; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 06:29:35 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: moss@cs.umass.edu Subject: Re: Why is taskset still not in util-linux? To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <1348011a-261a-2a87-d361-4e51fa8dc19f@cs.umass.edu> <85ae12aa-6cc3-5d4c-5df2-25bf811ec6a9@maxrnd.com> <72fea68a-b3d7-e87c-726f-8a5a2587a992@maxrnd.com> <01e3d337-e5fe-f393-7634-3f1881bca315@cs.umass.edu> <79d7afa5-a07b-04df-c259-b76c61390f8c@maxrnd.com> From: Eliot Moss Message-ID: <205bb6db-81d0-3530-2c5c-8ea76351e9a0@cs.umass.edu> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 06:29:34 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <79d7afa5-a07b-04df-c259-b76c61390f8c@maxrnd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:29:38 -0000 On 3/20/2020 1:54 AM, Mark Geisert wrote: > Mark Geisert wrote: >> Eliot Moss wrote: >> Rats.  Sorry you've hit some snags.  Are you compiling directly with 'make' or the preferred >> 'cygport util-linux.cygport build'?  With the latter I didn't need to make any changes to the >> source tree; all mods were accomplished with the new patch file and changes to util-linux.cygport >> itself. > > I've reproduced your snags.  It/they are due to my having forgotten another tiny update that should > have been part of the 2.33.1-cygwin-cpuset.patch file.  If you 'echo "#define SYS_sched_getaffinity > 42" > /usr/local/include/sys/syscall.h' and then back out your other fix attempts, the build using > cygport should work. What an amusing hack! I especially like the sensibility of 42! :-) I will try this. When I built it last night, I got a successful compile, but it didn't do anything. For example, taskset 1 ls did not output _anything_ -- no error message and no ls output :-( ... It will be the weekend here in Australia (I'm visiting, and wondering about exactly how and when I will get home) so maybe I'll play with it some more on Saturday ... Regards - Eliot