public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: prashantv <prashant.is.here@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Slow fork issue - Win x64
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21561482.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1542859895.20080918134643@F1-Photo.com>


My speeds are even slower than those posted:

Prashant@HOME [~]
$ while (true); do date; done | uniq -c
      1 Tue Jan 20 22:25:50 AUSEDT 2009
      1 Tue Jan 20 22:25:51 AUSEDT 2009
      2 Tue Jan 20 22:25:52 AUSEDT 2009
      1 Tue Jan 20 22:25:53 AUSEDT 2009
      2 Tue Jan 20 22:25:54 AUSEDT 2009
      2 Tue Jan 20 22:25:55 AUSEDT 2009
      1 Tue Jan 20 22:25:56 AUSEDT 2009
      3 Tue Jan 20 22:25:57 AUSEDT 2009
      1 Tue Jan 20 22:25:58 AUSEDT 2009
      2 Tue Jan 20 22:25:59 AUSEDT 2009
      2 Tue Jan 20 22:26:00 AUSEDT 2009
      2 Tue Jan 20 22:26:01 AUSEDT 2009

I am running cygwin 1.5.25, Windows 2008 x64 on a Intel Core 2 @ 2.13ghz.
One CPU is maxed to 100% when forking. This speed explained why opening bash
took as long as 10 seconds, and I wanted to find out why it was so slow.

Is it possible to profile the implementation easily?
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Slow-fork-issue---Win-x64-tp19538601p21561482.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-20 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1221716111.21095.ezmlm@cygwin.com>
2008-09-18 11:47 ` Jay
2008-09-18 15:23   ` Re[2]: " Paul-Kenji Cahier
2009-01-20 13:51     ` prashantv [this message]
2010-02-16 12:19       ` Jarkko Häkkinen
2010-02-18  0:15         ` Cyrille Lefevre
2010-02-18 21:20           ` Jarkko Häkkinen
2010-10-10 19:38         ` Re[2]: " Nicole Hamilton
2010-10-11 18:16           ` Reini Urban
2010-10-11 19:11             ` Nicole Hamilton
2008-09-18  3:23 Paul-Kenji Cahier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21561482.post@talk.nabble.com \
    --to=prashant.is.here@gmail.com \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).