From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23887 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2017 14:38:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 23864 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jul 2017 14:38:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: smtp-out-2.talktalk.net Received: from smtp-out-2.talktalk.net (HELO smtp-out-2.talktalk.net) (62.24.135.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:38:30 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([79.66.0.6]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id a0yhdgLpvjUsYa0yidFVo9; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:38:28 +0100 X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.2 cv=R5RBIpZX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=IUz/5zGOwx1AJbwgoa8h8g==:117 a=IUz/5zGOwx1AJbwgoa8h8g==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=w_pzkKWiAAAA:8 a=HEghvvgdGJlFcoC4mzgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=buB1NfXUTBUA:10 a=IfQ-iFkkCvMA:10 a=sRI3_1zDfAgwuvI8zelB:22 Subject: Re: "rebase-trigger full" To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <6951c29a-a869-3da9-6f28-70e441ed0dce@onetel.com> <467d8e79-6a72-b7ad-8c2c-9ac282f1ac45@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <2abf5d73-74d5-e1b8-0fa8-f346b1af8685@onetel.com> <27503828-70f4-aad6-2e04-408676108403@gmail.com> From: mike Message-ID: <236f08d8-a329-cd9f-04ab-a0bb9d47a889@onetel.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:45:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <27503828-70f4-aad6-2e04-408676108403@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfKR7U/INLUMslaJnI1G7z0XnUsQ1tGHGyziKwcX9xDYp9VypjS4oCgN66i/FBk+NPjQqDC+R8OoW3bPQTlMKM2UnqFtruNaC7IIfFvC4Jf460WhbZJ+D tf43UwLfI+eEWG24g/ad0A77LdNnLdnGdHO9JLkecp3K3LFbQnstt3rm X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00355.txt.bz2 On 25/07/2017 15:29, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 25/07/2017 16:12, mike wrote: >> On 25/07/2017 11:17, mike wrote: >>> On 25/07/2017 06:21, Brian Inglis wrote: >>> >> Thanks very much for that Brian. That seems to have done the trick. >> It's solved part of my problems anyway. However why does rebasing take >> such a long time? I would have thought that it would be quite fast >> using oldschool compile/link/load techniques. I'm not being critical I'm >> just curious because a long time ago I used to work on stuff like this >> myself. >> > > Hi Mike, > > "full" take long as need to rebase from scratch every single dll's. > It is only needed in case of problems. > > If you want to know how many dll's are rebased : > > $ rebase -si |wc -l > > > The usual rebase pass is incremental and it is much faster. > > Regards > Marco > > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > Thank you Marco. Maybe there are just way more dlls than I ever realised. Mike -- I *AM* a unique and special snowflake -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple