From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from p3plsmtpa09-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa09-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.237]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACED5385BF99 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 01:11:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org ACED5385BF99 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kosowsky.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kosowsky.org Received: from consult.pretender ([146.115.145.129]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id CWqInV7peQCatCWqIndcVI; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 18:11:22 -0700 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=e/XD9Yl/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=61f09fba a=BYuR5sdBHlGgEYWvfiqr5Q==:117 a=BYuR5sdBHlGgEYWvfiqr5Q==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=DghFqjY3_ZEA:10 a=Y4wjOHm_AAAA:8 a=9caYT6fcmY1u-b4CMcoA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=vUyUeBe4x1l68iL-zyVZ:22 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: inbox@kosowsky.org Received: from consult.pretender (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by consult.pretender (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A7B28E4394 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 20:11:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by consult.pretender (Postfix, from userid 495) id 84A9028E4393; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 20:11:21 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Level: Received: from consult.pretender (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by consult.pretender (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 207FF28E438F for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 20:11:21 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <25072.40889.109881.88802@consult.pretender> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 20:11:21 -0500 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Duplicate ACLs? - Can't copy file even with Admin permissions In-Reply-To: References: <25043.7019.643488.389876@consult.pretender> <8735m12k3u.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <25047.23325.33020.646017@consult.pretender> <25048.43238.484068.737126@consult.pretender> <25063.30447.365452.499124@consult.pretender> <25066.48079.253017.253466@consult.pretender> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 25.2.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: cygwin@kosowsky.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfK36vHg6mMs0BZ19ZAEdqNqatVoJ485mWg0dqnvaW0lbVxv0ifgfsOBEoY9FM7usUvD/kc2nosStttrfsgxfvVDY1gXPbhbYe57fjjHQECwy1cmKik9T /1sHWU3QG4yq03NeR3daCW8oDUolXlc5Eho8841UKnWX+Iz9QN0BXVC88BwYEKSkSYpPmRWXM1u6HiEwAMqIySEcxbIlVZWOIJk= X-Spam-Level: * X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 01:11:25 -0000 Corinna Vinschen wrote at about 20:19:42 +0100 on Tuesday, January 25, 2022: > On Jan 21 08:57, cygwin@kosowsky.org wrote: > > Hi Corinna, > > I found another file with ACLs that fail even under the new snapshot > > cygwin1.dll. > > > > #getfacl setup.ilg > > # file: setup.ilg > > # owner: Administrators > > # group: None > > getfacl: setup.ilg: Invalid argument > > > > #icacls.exe setup.ilg > > setup.ilg NT SERVICE\TrustedInstaller:(I)(F) > > NT SERVICE\TrustedInstaller:(I)(CI)(IO)(F) > > NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(I)(F) > > NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(F) > > BUILTIN\Administrators:(I)(F) > > BUILTIN\Administrators:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(F) > > BUILTIN\Users:(I)(RX) > > BUILTIN\Users:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(GR,GE) > > CREATOR OWNER:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(F) > > > > #icacls.exe setup.ilg /save setup.acl > > #cat setup.acl > > setup.ilg > > D:(A;ID;FA;;;S-1-5-80-956008885-3418522649-1831038044-1853292631-2271478464)(A;CIIOID;GA;;;S-1-5-80-956008885-3418522649-1831038044-1853292631-2271478464)(A;ID;FA;;;SY)(A;OICIIOID;GA;;;SY)(A;ID;FA;;;BA)(A;OICIIOID;GA;;;BA)(A;ID;0x1200a9;;;BU)(A;OICIIOID;GXGR;;;BU)(A;OICIIOID;GA;;;CO) > > > > ------------- > > Any thoughts on what might be wrong here? > > Again, the permissions don't make sense. However, that's no good reason > for Cygwin to bail out like this. I found the culprit, the core function > was still setting a certain indicator value for default ACEs even on > files. I pushed a patch and created new developer snapshots. > Thanks Corinna! That fixed it -- and eliminates pesky 'rsync' errors that I was encountering on my backup program. Jeff