From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sonic306-24.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic306-24.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.189.86]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10952385DC19 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 18:18:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 10952385DC19 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bellsouth.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=worsafe@bellsouth.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1587233880; bh=LZ/6jXZUNkHS0TUVxirI/qnB04pW2FZRzRXkKuPGQdA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=GyjSB3dSUL2ymfyxFIkCE8JfqmtzQpPrALCCPzJY8za7rK6tQIWOxt/GsuK3G3rKLKFJLBTKWqCwMOCiNw7AjF8MaPrnmKCVa0MqSO6P4EFkQXsVUZt8Pf61R1aoZuL7tjjqHPLbW2nUYYmZ8yqhAk18kRT8nuID031ag+Tdk40qeuVC/swVd8tZQkqC4W/+SCDZ8O8yrZVR3VViy/9RaVkQLV6odBRLxeEI2KxHS6cDipnBjWwTZTS19qLOwTCMrwmfdAsGd/CFKDGKVRi6iWF8ubqSIHUwmhYyJo6P8lGoJSuHNuS5CQ/bviIRTgJ2yXjaqi3/AGv9ehfrh0ks3g== X-YMail-OSG: RXyAUvUVM1ki9WaNHUbnCZ8gLSebwF1J9qSGnXIH4zG3XIzcl54fhfZWE0ZLe2B 4Vk8i8EMCIgWkXMCnlGRq_4Dh1UZLR_hT_PMIHORlL7p88iflcoakEfFh9GuvyfueB8RbLGaHWae HqU8zmtLiFO8dobEleDKLPyUmwr0qSEvQGK.6Zs0N0ub4BgHmb_1XitiUn7Yn0B5yCxbU05kW7U7 Je76o09mTWS7pM6jsDVpmUArn6l1Gb42OsxDUqjwbet.up1HPwkdsKAGncwJEgqotjUAI5CvIA09 XAl.rZBSl9bi0cUanKo5HXpMeOmDon1Z6x5y4qeUg7uQuxvKhI7B5K0dA3aV9.fY9fWoz1MhPqeF UQnwohYW6XaN1MCAdX85b5a1tFPvrfY5Uu3Vy6PMReA4MXE2HwxnoFB9M_1Gf9QH0DWOCgq2AyUM _WjA1RLFkyuWaA6WeCY9mec20YnNCg9rtUZViQiZSd7BUaMESNv7liDPXZBoWRtESgnK34E3MB81 DtIqtbTFcpbZM2QDyQOUZC8Qd7SXbpLzsO5IMngZ59CqHqTg2Ff0XcW7pmfhjPeX5LI4UagxBS2p TBooAh2ACK7P71Kgg8bkuhZMaMQrdDeEDgu_p77BkOKxJkI4WJquTZpV0EKUjtkovKWICA3Uz1uL l8y._ivmkygkg0dFrqbCUjO.xEDQZKhrO7HB.5dTiuNnSbp8IaBUhJRZn3VImDfh1W.BXK.OMwb5 L2Up5TOCad.8St2VrK_nIKL67CeoaOdR6wvS9v7PTX.8bqm7jG7utGikzP9l0_iZ6MX.X32ArwRT 4Uc8dFaXS9pVxXu0Rj0QNgFXOb_fz2FJ7imoc7JOS.Es.BkS9aJ8n1xnd.MTEZD.TUyN7tj6SV8v XvKj9GDRqtlgfFyQjcjbTP0ZMFbnPGLwrK2NbaeB1u_X9uYZwYIB4M09MVrGbCf9koffW5MHl4ZD edWAdyAS6Q8RswBRJgqhxdpar0waalbgxx0tJJLt0BsL2cx0AQaqMXAE42gDBO9ipbqCeIb6zC45 2yAMn3BCD3uUxPekfB64HugbOW_yl2ptMRc4VO7gWbVekHdQt_tnVRau3UW65qwz.aTEtm2d8IyY aB8LfBkFWrW_ep_m1_BpeqTPK1OKctvSz5OTTzEYucZOfIxkOMZ.c5unq3IawWzlnPv26ePPw.N3 Czzn07BDR9QBFxtlv4JsIIJ.LBvXoLU.eVZsr1PZyOGxcW4fBr4OC0nIhwL0mNi0T2MqHM.nXBFj TgeNlEkyIkqfRuIARehc9dMhqG6lMDNzH_Q5IBZZKv8KEmX7iPuLhc9EZNWkDzdO34MPCBxsaZP6 WWzPfcnaXCHEYuKBNRsytAabA5r9l_c_P6Fp_iqEUV6.YKiPWtchxpjbldWwk19SZfCgEadfYACw - Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic306.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 18:18:00 +0000 Received: by smtp432.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 8b68f9a5bb55a0409e80f7f41db3b1a3; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 18:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: gfortran 9.3 write format error To: cygwin cygwin References: From: Charles Russell Message-ID: <2593fa5a-84dd-dadd-ea84-d16d465965db@bellsouth.net> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 13:13:30 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.15651 hermes Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.1.4 (Java/11.0.6) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 18:18:02 -0000 On 4/18/2020 11:23 AM, Brian Inglis wrote: what compiler version are you using on Debian $ gfortran --version GNU Fortran (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0 When support ended for g77 I feared for my collection of old fortran code, but it all worked fine under gfortran after a few trivial changes that I made years ago. (BLOCK DATA had to be rewritten, but I had used that only once.) The gfortran developers must intend to keep viable all that netlib code that has been widely used and thoroughly debugged. No problems with the above gfortran version, which is newer than the most recent one for Cygwin. So I doubt that the error message comes from intentional compiler changes. Like you, I can't understand why a syntax error should appear at run time. gfortran is good at finding syntax errors at compile time. I'm still using fortran 77 because it meets my needs, I know where the bugs hide, and that is the language of most netlib code and of all my old tools. gfortran handles it well.