From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.13]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1B5A386F816 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 17:52:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B1B5A386F816 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=brian.inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([24.64.172.44]) by shaw.ca with ESMTP id cunrjfV5ang7Kcunsj8J2n; Sun, 24 May 2020 11:52:52 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=ecemg4MH c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:117 a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=sjQ9hgYAQaIklh6-tdMA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin doesn't support IO_REPARSE_TAG_APPEXECLINK To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <878shh751g.fsf@Otto.invalid> From: Brian Inglis Autocrypt: addr=Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEXopx8xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAnCK0qv/xwUCCZQoA9BHRYpstERrspfT0NkUWQVuoePa0 LkJyaWFuIEluZ2xpcyA8QnJpYW4uSW5nbGlzQFN5c3RlbWF0aWNTdy5hYi5jYT6IlgQTFggA PhYhBMM5/lbU970GBS2bZB62lxu92I8YBQJeinHzAhsDBQkJZgGABQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQW AgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEB62lxu92I8Y0ioBAI8xrggNxziAVmr+Xm6nnyjoujMqWcq3oEhlYGAO WacZAQDFtdDx2koSVSoOmfaOyRTbIWSf9/Cjai29060fsmdsDLg4BF6KcfMSCisGAQQBl1UB BQEBB0Awv8kHI2PaEgViDqzbnoe8B9KMHoBZLS92HdC7ZPh8HQMBCAeIfgQYFggAJhYhBMM5 /lbU970GBS2bZB62lxu92I8YBQJeinHzAhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEB62lxu92I8YZwUBAJw/74rF IyaSsGI7ewCdCy88Lce/kdwX7zGwid+f8NZ3AQC/ezTFFi5obXnyMxZJN464nPXiggtT9gN5 RSyTY8X+AQ== Organization: Systematic Software Message-ID: <280924d7-efba-b6c9-46a3-c00affa5731d@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 11:52:51 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <878shh751g.fsf@Otto.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfICRgUEA04ELIAatBmWWqukK7L9Zv4gFZEKBILMrvFpwnregUiB1ZyyFgkUgy+QxQHiHvxPgYMt66AQ/Q1zyCAM9AxeFuFzjPqIgA7mHZTGUB1hgRO3E epfRHjbcLs99yyDhIQR8e6qT206DGTIiLEs45AzNiWAyzEdKcv1ZByWtO6m3o6cVYHNlxfEI+g7nWQ== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 17:52:54 -0000 On 2020-05-24 08:59, ASSI wrote: > Adam Dinwoodie writes: >> Outlook is singularly bad for letting you use this style of email >> reply; > > True, but you _can_ configure it away from that default, although almost > nobody does it and yes it's not very obvious and needs changes in at > least three different corners of the settings maze. Thunderbird is not much better, as you have to find the Button to click, to define domains to which you only wish to send emails in text, and line length, which is global, not per-domain, or overridable for one message. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. [Data in IEC units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]