From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A303861002 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 01:57:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 63A303861002 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=jbrain.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=brain@jbrain.com Received: from [192.168.1.224] ([97.127.232.31]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIL1t-1l9uTl0JmZ-004ADZ for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 02:57:38 +0100 Subject: Re: cygwin Rsync x32 issue To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <8f0ae573-df06-0fed-3e39-a0f56fb6f1a9@jbrain.com> <187d2df6-07fa-7d97-9e39-91330d6bf872@jbrain.com> <9dcf94bb-6231-1785-7bf9-0aca60133004@cornell.edu> From: Jim Brain Message-ID: <2964515d-d586-b673-0ab3-ccc894630e5f@jbrain.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:57:37 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9dcf94bb-6231-1785-7bf9-0aca60133004@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Xl/ez11w4kh46MEEWmwqvA1XCVNEMBY0/VTPLNCaDLWb99jP492 aOSQx4lNN9xefUUcsMSpjgBzIbkfhMN4lWX1cibXlZnCoTgYIhgOWII7OtCMHHkU4dA9Lma 0u/I5doORVNDm7tFyItVm2tRX+ZiOJ51y46lF/xAZ5meZj5AfySZ3w1+hsTeE+D3yJ5pYfZ eBD+Kp7g2DNMW+x+3v4Fw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:QEN7zlv5Rdc=:1VPqRwPlQjv2PyNm619rbw p2BoYEL0H9wIjHwjxLfzGbe3QNZajw8DGVvbKRQJ1nUBgASasW6PausgEYlR/Jdm9cKeo5a+7 XxRVuCis/fQSfrgwfSnYgNWjrhOHH0qLKcxRCTacINRntyy1sv+HBFhiXhvBjR7+RlLF6+3uD GDoTNJwCov/3KjKxUAEqULkAX8JQ+cfc9d6KfcPDWv9E1Kf4hvj+xjMQedeSagROLPiEhcawh EmBvCKWCm9UXp/BJiP+smu4+Ohh45UCSRkvdzAp5b9slWJvaUcVXqAa11jQ0i10iCYi0rafN+ MIOxr11nXUGJ13naFmhyRCOvuwEOwwTo08GbAu4K881RvrGVUW+Ix8pT6Jc8JPtg5ohgi67iH 60WUPZGfxdnLhW4sXXC/CJH26zS5UF7mumaT/s88dnbxYcr5X3RJUZmBNDc22 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 01:57:40 -0000 On 2/15/2021 5:18 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: > On 2/14/2021 9:48 PM, Jim Brain wrote: >> On 2/14/2021 8:21 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: >>> >>> >>>   strace -o rsync.strace rsync... >>> >>> Then post rsync.strace somewhere where people can look at it. >> >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/v1n9i77jhq3b3zh/rsync.strace?dl=0 > > Thanks.  For the sake of comparison, could you also post the strace > output from a successful (64-bit) run?  I saw a suspicious > CreateProcess failure, but I'd like to be sure it doesn't occur in the > successful run also. https://www.dropbox.com/s/lm8b8glkw2t9934/rsync64.strace?dl=0 > > And is it possible for you to create a failing rsync command that > others could try to replicate?  There would be a better chance of > debugging this if I could run a failing rsync command under gdb. I will directly email you a ZIP of the folder.  It's not big (some small HTML files the guy manages) and a few script files. > > I noticed some things about your PATH in the cygcheck output that you > posted. > > 1. Your PATH is very long.  Could you try simplifying it to see if > that helps? For example, > >   PATH=/usr/bin rsync... Hmm, I can try. > > 2. Your PATH contains the /bin directories from both your 32-bit and > your 64-bit Cygwin installations.  I don't know if that's part of your > problem, but it's worth checking. Yeah, this machine I normally run the 64 bit versions, but just opened a shell and prepended the 32 bit dir to test. > > 3. You have an environment variable APTH that looks suspiciously like > your PATH.  This may be irrelevant, but you probably don't want that. That was me fatfingering #2