From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23806 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2017 21:12:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 23685 invoked by uid 89); 16 Mar 2017 21:12:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=dekker, Dekker, H*f:sk:858F859, H*i:sk:858F859 X-HELO: mail-it0-f54.google.com Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-it0-f54.google.com) (209.85.214.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 21:12:05 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id m27so3716817iti.1 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:12:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mlvGIek2MYG6yEOMVMhBdcUlrdGeMxyr6pbI6vkP65M=; b=fbiJvCBoNXxKDNeTwNbongvkRb3v8bAGLa8f+yIXwcNqjaIhoPHnS9txATo7Aq2Lwj w4t6rBVMqOFRALK4d95pyx34t4o5uUH3QI0gwr926jmxfn0cN/2l3aQAytQ+UK/Do1pp HbM13NqqZWA3hzpqGGAvDOxnvvGx2uUfytevESyqbM2K8OACEkdt4fkXmAUZn98AiQZA li2I+tnUlOK6Wpv5Irhf6E2DV829+iDIyHHmdMzgKGsHvYuGzNhqE3gRBAaCknEtV0Ot MBBAcBo67OU2UaeOYaiVP7PQtXgRD8eyXXlAVKp4hvkdXHvBeo4YqKZNoAKUPn8eKWfW mjbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0SRVcTW2US6jWV5g6sDTTrmN/xnOrvSs/bX3eBXlbgPBQ3p1GKbdCIwm5VvMp9Rw== X-Received: by 10.107.38.16 with SMTP id m16mr11299339iom.106.1489698724159; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:12:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (d27-96-48-76.nap.wideopenwest.com. [96.27.76.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u191sm115352ita.15.2017.03.16.14.12.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:12:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: XWin.exe causes a 25% CPU load on Windows 7 To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <858F859BB4F2824EBAB5D4ED58214CB7016A45F4C7@NLBAWEXMBX3.infor.com> From: cyg Simple Message-ID: <2b61e48a-065c-83bd-0b59-ebe9bac27c67@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 21:12:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <858F859BB4F2824EBAB5D4ED58214CB7016A45F4C7@NLBAWEXMBX3.infor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 On 3/16/2017 11:28 AM, Kees Dekker wrote: > > I know, the above information is vague, but do anyone have a suggestion/suggestion how to find a root cause? > Unfortunately, I don't know when this higher-than-expected CPU load occurred for the first time. The problem became somewhat more urgent as our IT department moved our systems to a newer virus scanner, that also seems to take (much) more resources. The combination of these two makes working with this PC bad. > Yes > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html See the above. -- cyg Simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple