From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 55040 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2017 22:12:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 55025 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2017 22:12:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: limerock01.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock01.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock01.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.241) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 22:12:28 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite4.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.9]) by limerock01.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id v6UMCPrI023031 for ; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 18:12:26 -0400 Received: from [10.13.22.3] (50-192-26-108-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.192.26.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id v6UMCOTS024960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 18:12:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] _autorebase-001006-1 To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <2d4f264f-9dc9-713a-9073-5889a203495c@cornell.edu> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 12:54:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Cornell-Gauge: Gauge=X X-PMX-CORNELL-AUTH-RESULTS: dkim-out=none; X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00433.txt.bz2 On 7/30/2017 9:13 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: > The _autorebase package has been updated to work correctly on file > systems that don't allow timestamps for the start of the UNIX epoch. Just out of curiosity, what's the significance of the dates "1999-05-03 07:29:06 UTC" and "2002-08-17 07:00 CEST" in rebaselst? Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple